• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • The Manchester Institute Cancer Research UK
    • All Paterson Institute for Cancer Research
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • The Manchester Institute Cancer Research UK
    • All Paterson Institute for Cancer Research
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of ChristieCommunitiesTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsThis CollectionTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Local Links

    The Christie WebsiteChristie Library and Knowledge Service

    Statistics

    Display statistics

    Randomized prospective biomarker trial of ERCC1 for comparing platinum and nonplatinum therapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: ERCC1 trial (ET).

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Authors
    Lee, S
    Falzon, M
    Blackhall, Fiona H
    Spicer, J
    Nicolson, M
    Chaudhuri, A
    Middleton, G
    Ahmed, S
    Hicks, J
    Crosse, B
    Napier, M
    Singer, J
    Ferry, D
    Lewanski, C
    Forster, M
    Rolls, S
    Capitanio, A
    Rudd, R
    Iles, N
    Ngai, Y
    Gandy, M
    Lillywhite, R
    Hackshaw, A
    Show allShow less
    Affiliation
    University College London, University College London Hospitals
    Issue Date
    2016-11-28
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Purpose Retrospective studies indicate that expression of excision repair cross complementing group 1 (ERCC1) protein is associated with platinum resistance and survival in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We conducted the first randomized trial, to our knowledge, to evaluate ERCC1 prospectively and to assess the superiority of nonplatinum therapy over platinum doublet therapy for ERCC1-positive NSCLC as well as noninferiority for ERCC1-negative NSCLC. Patients and Methods This trial had a marker-by-treatment interaction phase III design, with ERCC1 (8F1 antibody) status as a randomization stratification factor. Chemonaïve patients with NSCLC (stage IIIB and IV) were eligible. Patients with squamous histology were randomly assigned to cisplatin and gemcitabine or paclitaxel and gemcitabine; nonsquamous patients received cisplatin and pemetrexed or paclitaxel and pemetrexed. Primary end point was overall survival (OS). We also evaluated an antibody specific for XPF (clone 3F2). The target hazard ratio (HR) for patients with ERCC1-positive NSCLC was ≤ 0.78. Results Of patients, 648 were recruited (177 squamous, 471 nonsquamous). ERCC1-positive rates were 54.5% and 76.7% in nonsquamous and squamous patients, respectively, and the corresponding XPF-positive rates were 70.5% and 68.5%. Accrual stopped early in 2012 for squamous patients because OS for nonplatinum therapy was inferior to platinum therapy (median OS, 7.6 months [paclitaxel and gemcitabine] v 10.7 months [cisplatin and gemcitabine]; HR, 1.46; P = .02). Accrual for nonsquamous patients halted in 2013. Median OS was 8.0 (paclitaxel and pemetrexed) versus 9.6 (cisplatin and pemetrexed) months for ERCC1-positive patients (HR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.85 to 1.44), and 10.3 (paclitaxel and pemetrexed) versus 11.6 (cisplatin and pemetrexed) months for ERCC1-negative patients (HR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.73 to 1.33; interaction P = .64). OS HR was 1.09 (95% CI, 0.83 to 1.44) for XPF-positive patients, and 1.39 (95% CI, 0.90 to 2.15) for XPF-negative patients (interaction P = .35). Neither ERCC1 nor XPF were prognostic: among nonsquamous patients, OS HRs for positive versus negative were ERCC1, 1.11 ( P = .32), and XPF, 1.08 ( P = .55). Conclusion Superior outcomes were observed for patients with squamous histology who received platinum therapy compared with nonplatinum chemotherapy; however, selecting chemotherapy by using commercially available ERCC1 or XPF antibodies did not confer any extra survival benefit.
    Citation
    Randomized prospective biomarker trial of ERCC1 for comparing platinum and nonplatinum therapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: ERCC1 trial (ET). 2016, J. Clin. Oncol.
    Journal
    Journal of Clinical Oncology
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10541/620045
    PubMed ID
    27893326
    Type
    Article
    Language
    en
    ISSN
    1527-7755
    Collections
    All Paterson Institute for Cancer Research

    entitlement

    Related articles

    • ERCC1 assessment in upfront treatment with and without cisplatin-based chemotherapy in stage IIIB/IV non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer.
    • Authors: Villalobos M, Czapiewski P, Reinmuth N, Fischer JR, Andreas S, Kortsik C, Serke M, Wolf M, Neuser P, Reuss A, Schnabel PA, Thomas M
    • Issue date: 2018 Jun 15
    • Prognostic and predictive role of ERCC1 protein expression in locally advanced stage III non-small cell lung cancer.
    • Authors: Sad LM, Younis SG, Elity MM
    • Issue date: 2014 Jul
    • Predictive value of APE1, BRCA1, ERCC1 and TUBB3 expression in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving first-line platinum-paclitaxel chemotherapy.
    • Authors: Li Z, Qing Y, Guan W, Li M, Peng Y, Zhang S, Xiong Y, Wang D
    • Issue date: 2014 Oct
    • Customized Adjuvant Chemotherapy Based on Biomarker Examination May Improve Survival of Patients Completely Resected for Non-small-cell Lung Cancer.
    • Authors: Liu D, Nakashima N, Nakano J, Tarumi S, Matsuura N, Nakano T, Nii K, Tokunaga Y, Go T, Yokomise H
    • Issue date: 2017 May
    • ERCC1 expression does not predict survival and treatment response in advanced stage non-small cell lung cancer cases treated with platinum based chemotherapy.
    • Authors: Ozdemir O, Ozdemir P, Veral A, Uluer H, Ozhan MH
    • Issue date: 2013
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2021)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.