Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKosmin, M
dc.contributor.authorBrown, S
dc.contributor.authorHague, Christina
dc.contributor.authorSaid, J
dc.contributor.authorWells, L
dc.contributor.authorWilson, C
dc.date.accessioned2016-06-24T12:07:13Z
dc.date.available2016-06-24T12:07:13Z
dc.date.issued2016-05-12
dc.identifier.citationCurrent views on clinical oncology training from the 2015 oncology registrars' forum survey. 2016en
dc.identifier.issn1433-2981
dc.identifier.pmid27184941
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.clon.2016.04.043
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10541/614566
dc.description.abstractThe major role of the Oncology Registrars' Forum (ORF) of the Royal College of Radiologists is to voice the opinions of the clinical oncology trainee body and work towards improving all aspects of clinical oncology training in the UK. In order to provide data to support these efforts, the ORF undertakes a biennial survey of all trainees. As with the previous surveys, this year's ORF survey produced data that highlight areas of good training as well as new and ongoing areas of concern. This summary highlights the key survey results and provides recommendations for improving the delivery of clinical oncology training in the UK.
dc.languageENGen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.rightsArchived with thanks to Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain))en
dc.titleCurrent views on clinical oncology training from the 2015 oncology registrars' forum survey.en
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.departmentMount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, Middlesex, UKen
dc.identifier.journalClinical Oncologyen
html.description.abstractThe major role of the Oncology Registrars' Forum (ORF) of the Royal College of Radiologists is to voice the opinions of the clinical oncology trainee body and work towards improving all aspects of clinical oncology training in the UK. In order to provide data to support these efforts, the ORF undertakes a biennial survey of all trainees. As with the previous surveys, this year's ORF survey produced data that highlight areas of good training as well as new and ongoing areas of concern. This summary highlights the key survey results and provides recommendations for improving the delivery of clinical oncology training in the UK.


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record