The suitability of common metrics for assessing parotid and larynx autosegmentation accuracy.
AffiliationUniversity of Manchester; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust
MetadataShow full item record
AbstractContouring structures in the head and neck is time-consuming, and automatic seg-mentation is an important part of an adaptive radiotherapy workflow. Geometric accuracy of automatic segmentation algorithms has been widely reported, but there is no consensus as to which metrics provide clinically meaningful results. This study investigated whether geometric accuracy (as quantified by several commonly used metrics) was associated with dosimetric differences for the parotid and larynx, comparing automatically generated contours against manually drawn ground truth contours. This enabled the suitability of different commonly used metrics to be assessed for measuring automatic segmentation accuracy of the parotid and larynx. Parotid and larynx structures for 10 head and neck patients were outlined by five clinicians to create ground truth structures. An automatic segmentation algorithm was used to create automatically generated normal structures, which were then used to create volumetric-modulated arc therapy plans. The mean doses to the automatically generated structures were compared with those of the corresponding ground truth structures, and the relative difference in mean dose was calculated for each structure. It was found that this difference did not correlate with the geometric accuracy provided by several metrics, notably the Dice similarity coefficient, which is a commonly used measure of spatial overlap. Surface-based metrics provided stronger correlation and are, therefore, more suitable for assessing automatic seg-mentation of the parotid and larynx.
CitationThe suitability of common metrics for assessing parotid and larynx autosegmentation accuracy. 2016, 17 (2):5889 J Appl Clin Med Phys
JournalJournal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
- Automatic segmentation of head and neck CT images for radiotherapy treatment planning using multiple atlases, statistical appearance models, and geodesic active contours.
- Authors: Fritscher KD, Peroni M, Zaffino P, Spadea MF, Schubert R, Sharp G
- Issue date: 2014 May
- Dosimetric evaluation of automatic segmentation for adaptive IMRT for head-and-neck cancer.
- Authors: Tsuji SY, Hwang A, Weinberg V, Yom SS, Quivey JM, Xia P
- Issue date: 2010 Jul 1
- Evaluation of an automatic segmentation algorithm for definition of head and neck organs at risk.
- Authors: Thomson D, Boylan C, Liptrot T, Aitkenhead A, Lee L, Yap B, Sykes A, Rowbottom C, Slevin N
- Issue date: 2014 Aug 3
- The feasibility of atlas-based automatic segmentation of MRI for H&N radiotherapy planning.
- Authors: Wardman K, Prestwich RJ, Gooding MJ, Speight RJ
- Issue date: 2016 Jul 8
- Geometric and dosimetric evaluations of atlas-based segmentation methods of MR images in the head and neck region.
- Authors: Kieselmann JP, Kamerling CP, Burgos N, Menten MJ, Fuller CD, Nill S, Cardoso MJ, Oelfke U
- Issue date: 2018 Jul 11