Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorIavazzo, Christos
dc.contributor.authorMamais, I
dc.contributor.authorGkegkes, I
dc.date.accessioned2016-04-18T08:39:36Zen
dc.date.available2016-04-18T08:39:36Zen
dc.date.issued2016-03-11en
dc.identifier.citationRobotic assisted vs laparoscopic and/or open myomectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinical evidence. 2016: Arch Gynecol Obsteten
dc.identifier.issn1432-0711en
dc.identifier.pmid26969650en
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00404-016-4061-6en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10541/605661en
dc.description.abstractUterine myomas are relative frequent in premenopausal women. The development of advanced minimally invasive surgical techniques proposed robotic-assisted myomectomy as an equally safe and effective treatment option.
dc.languageENGen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.rightsArchived with thanks to Archives of gynecology and obstetricsen
dc.titleRobotic assisted vs laparoscopic and/or open myomectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinical evidence.en
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.departmentGynecological Oncology Department, Christie Hospital, Manchester, UKen
dc.identifier.journalArchives of Gynecology and Obstetricsen
html.description.abstractUterine myomas are relative frequent in premenopausal women. The development of advanced minimally invasive surgical techniques proposed robotic-assisted myomectomy as an equally safe and effective treatment option.


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record