Hypofractionated radiotherapy versus conventionally fractionated radiotherapy for patients with intermediate-risk localised prostate cancer: 2-year patient-reported outcomes of the randomised, non-inferiority, phase 3 CHHiP trial.
Authors
Wilkins, AMossop, H
Syndikus, I
Khoo, V
Bloomfield, D
Parker, C
Logue, John P
Scrase, C
Patterson, H
Birtle, A
Staffurth, J
Malik, Z
Panades, M
Eswar, C
Graham, J
Russell, M
Kirkbride, P
O'Sullivan, J
Gao, A
Cruickshank, C
Griffin, C
Dearnaley, D
Hall, E
Affiliation
The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UKIssue Date
2015-10-27
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) might detect more toxic effects of radiotherapy than do clinician-reported outcomes. We did a quality of life (QoL) substudy to assess PROs up to 24 months after conventionally fractionated or hypofractionated radiotherapy in the Conventional or Hypofractionated High Dose Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy in Prostate Cancer (CHHiP) trial.Citation
Hypofractionated radiotherapy versus conventionally fractionated radiotherapy for patients with intermediate-risk localised prostate cancer: 2-year patient-reported outcomes of the randomised, non-inferiority, phase 3 CHHiP trial. 2015: Lancet Oncol, 16(16):1605-16Journal
The Lancet. OncologyDOI
10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00280-6PubMed ID
26522334Type
ArticleLanguage
enISSN
1474-5488ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00280-6
Scopus Count
Collections
Related articles
- Conventional versus hypofractionated high-dose intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer: 5-year outcomes of the randomised, non-inferiority, phase 3 CHHiP trial.
- Authors: Dearnaley D, Syndikus I, Mossop H, Khoo V, Birtle A, Bloomfield D, Graham J, Kirkbride P, Logue J, Malik Z, Money-Kyrle J, O'Sullivan JM, Panades M, Parker C, Patterson H, Scrase C, Staffurth J, Stockdale A, Tremlett J, Bidmead M, Mayles H, Naismith O, South C, Gao A, Cruickshank C, Hassan S, Pugh J, Griffin C, Hall E, CHHiP Investigators.
- Issue date: 2016 Aug
- Ultra-hypofractionated versus conventionally fractionated radiotherapy for prostate cancer (HYPO-RT-PC): patient-reported quality-of-life outcomes of a randomised, controlled, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial.
- Authors: Fransson P, Nilsson P, Gunnlaugsson A, Beckman L, Tavelin B, Norman D, Thellenberg-Karlsson C, Hoyer M, Lagerlund M, Kindblom J, Ginman C, Johansson B, Björnlinger K, Seke M, Agrup M, Zackrisson B, Kjellén E, Franzén L, Widmark A
- Issue date: 2021 Feb
- Conventional versus hypofractionated high-dose intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer: preliminary safety results from the CHHiP randomised controlled trial.
- Authors: Dearnaley D, Syndikus I, Sumo G, Bidmead M, Bloomfield D, Clark C, Gao A, Hassan S, Horwich A, Huddart R, Khoo V, Kirkbride P, Mayles H, Mayles P, Naismith O, Parker C, Patterson H, Russell M, Scrase C, South C, Staffurth J, Hall E
- Issue date: 2012 Jan
- Intensity-modulated fractionated radiotherapy versus stereotactic body radiotherapy for prostate cancer (PACE-B): acute toxicity findings from an international, randomised, open-label, phase 3, non-inferiority trial.
- Authors: Brand DH, Tree AC, Ostler P, van der Voet H, Loblaw A, Chu W, Ford D, Tolan S, Jain S, Martin A, Staffurth J, Camilleri P, Kancherla K, Frew J, Chan A, Dayes IS, Henderson D, Brown S, Cruickshank C, Burnett S, Duffton A, Griffin C, Hinder V, Morrison K, Naismith O, Hall E, van As N, PACE Trial Investigators.
- Issue date: 2019 Nov
- Hypofractionated versus conventionally fractionated radiotherapy for patients with localised prostate cancer (HYPRO): final efficacy results from a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 trial.
- Authors: Incrocci L, Wortel RC, Alemayehu WG, Aluwini S, Schimmel E, Krol S, van der Toorn PP, Jager H, Heemsbergen W, Heijmen B, Pos F
- Issue date: 2016 Aug