Suboptimal use of intravenous contrast during radiotherapy planning in the UK.
Affiliation
Department of Clinical Oncology, Christie Hospital, Manchester, UK.Issue Date
2008-12
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
We aimed to evaluate the use of intravenous (IV) contrast during acquisition of radiotherapy planning (RTP) scans and to compare current usage with the Royal College of Radiologists' (RCR) recommendations. Questionnaires were circulated via the Academic Clinical Oncology and Radiobiology Research Network (ACORRN) website, email and post to 60 UK radiotherapy centre managers. Questions were asked regarding the (i) tumour sites where IV contrast was used, (ii) person administering the contrast, (iii) availability of dynamic pump, (iv) tumour sites that centres wished to use contrast, (v) reasons for not using contrast and (vi) awareness of RCR recommendations. 50 (83%) centres responded to the questionnaire, of which 27 responded via the ACCORN website and 18 by e-mail. Despite 38 out of 50 responding centres using IV contrast, and accessibility to dynamic pumps existing in 39 centres, IV contrast usage was suboptimal, with more than half of the centres (27/50; 54%) wishing to use it at more tumour sites. IV contrast was most often used during RTP of the brain, with suboptimal usage in lung tumours. None of the 50 centres administered IV contrast during RTP scan acquisition in all of the 8 RCR recommended tumour sites. Radiographers were mainly responsible for contrast administration, and a lack of staff was cited as the main reason for suboptimal contrast usage. Disappointingly, only 35 of the 50 radiotherapy managers (70%) were aware of the RCR recommendations. Redress of the underlying reasons for suboptimal IV contrast administration during RTP, including acquisition of the necessary skill mix by staff and implementation of RCR recommendations, would help standardize UK practice.Citation
Suboptimal use of intravenous contrast during radiotherapy planning in the UK. 2008, 81 (972):963-9 Br J RadiolJournal
The British Journal of RadiologyDOI
10.1259/bjr/24432468PubMed ID
18762482Type
ArticleLanguage
enISSN
1748-880Xae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1259/bjr/24432468
Scopus Count
Related articles
- Results of a national survey of radiotherapy planning and delivery in the UK in 2007.
- Authors: Jefferies S, Taylor A, Reznek R, Radiotherapy Planning Working Party
- Issue date: 2009 Apr
- [Radio-anatomy atlas for delineation SIRIADE website: features and 1 year results].
- Authors: Denis F, Pointreau Y
- Issue date: 2010 Nov
- IPEM Topical Report: A 2018 IPEM survey of MRI use for external beam radiotherapy treatment planning in the UK.
- Authors: Speight R, Schmidt MA, Liney GP, Johnstone RI, Eccles CL, Dubec M, George B, Henry A, McCallum H
- Issue date: 2019 Sep 5
- New developments in MRI for target volume delineation in radiotherapy.
- Authors: Khoo VS, Joon DL
- Issue date: 2006 Sep
- Radiotherapy treatment verification in the UK: an audit of practice in 2004.
- Authors: Stratford J, Ball K, Henry AM, Cullen JN, Swindell R, Price P, Jain P
- Issue date: 2006 Feb