A randomised assessment of vosaroxin and vosaroxin combined with low dose Ara-C (LDAC) versus low dose Ara-C alone in older patients with acute myeloid leukemia.
AffiliationDepartment of Haematology, Christie Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom
MetadataShow full item record
AbstractThe development of new treatments for older patients with Acute Myeloid Leukaemia (AML) is an active area, but has met with limited success. Vosaroxin, a quinolone derived intercalating agent has several properties which could prove beneficial. Initial clinical studies showed it to be well tolerated in older patients with relapsed/refractory disease. In vitro data suggested synergy with Ara-C. To evaluate vosaroxin, we performed two randomised comparisons within the "Pick A Winner" Programme. 104 patients were randomized to vosaroxin vs low dose Ara-C (LDAC) and 104 to vosaroxin+LDAC vs LDAC. When comparing vosaroxin with LDAC neither response rate (CR/CRi), (26% vs 30%; odds ratio (OR) 1.16 (0.49-2.72) p=0.7) nor 12-month survival (12% vs 31%; hazard ratio (HR) 1.94 (1.26-3.00) p=0.003) showed benefit for vosaroxin. Likewise, in the vosaroxin+LDAC vs LDAC comparison, neither response rate (CR/CRi 38% vs 34%; OR 0.83 (0.37-1.84) p=0.6), nor survival (33% vs 37%, HR 1.30 (0.81-2.07) p=0.3) was improved. A major reason for this lack of benefit was excess early mortality in the vosaroxin+LDAC arm, most obviously in the second month following randomisation. At its first interim analysis, the Data Monitoring and Ethics Committee recommended closure of the vosaroxin-containing trial arms as a clinically relevant benefit was unlikely.
CitationA randomised assessment of vosaroxin and vosaroxin combined with low dose Ara-C (LDAC) versus low dose Ara-C alone in older patients with acute myeloid leukemia. 2015: Blood
- A phase 1b/2 study of vosaroxin in combination with cytarabine in patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia.
- Authors: Lancet JE, Roboz GJ, Cripe LD, Michelson GC, Fox JA, Leavitt RD, Chen T, Hawtin R, Craig AR, Ravandi F, Maris MB, Stuart RK, Karp JE
- Issue date: 2015 Feb
- Vosaroxin plus cytarabine versus placebo plus cytarabine in patients with first relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukaemia (VALOR): a randomised, controlled, double-blind, multinational, phase 3 study.
- Authors: Ravandi F, Ritchie EK, Sayar H, Lancet JE, Craig MD, Vey N, Strickland SA, Schiller GJ, Jabbour E, Erba HP, Pigneux A, Horst HA, Recher C, Klimek VM, Cortes J, Roboz GJ, Odenike O, Thomas X, Havelange V, Maertens J, Derigs HG, Heuser M, Damon L, Powell BL, Gaidano G, Carella AM, Wei A, Hogge D, Craig AR, Fox JA, Ward R, Smith JA, Acton G, Mehta C, Stuart RK, Kantarjian HM
- Issue date: 2015 Sep
- A randomised comparison of the novel nucleoside analogue sapacitabine with low-dose cytarabine in older patients with acute myeloid leukaemia.
- Authors: Burnett AK, Russell N, Hills RK, Panoskaltsis N, Khwaja A, Hemmaway C, Cahalin P, Clark RE, Milligan D
- Issue date: 2015 Jun
- The addition of gemtuzumab ozogamicin to low-dose Ara-C improves remission rate but does not significantly prolong survival in older patients with acute myeloid leukaemia: results from the LRF AML14 and NCRI AML16 pick-a-winner comparison.
- Authors: Burnett AK, Hills RK, Hunter AE, Milligan D, Kell WJ, Wheatley K, Yin J, McMullin MF, Dignum H, Bowen D, Russell NH, UK National Cancer Research Institute AML Working Group.
- Issue date: 2013 Jan
- A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis Comparing the Efficacies of Eleven Novel Therapies with the Common Salvage Regimen for Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia.
- Authors: Huang J, Gui C, Zhang L, Che F, Wang C
- Issue date: 2018