Browsing All Paterson Institute for Cancer Research by Authors
CD8 T-cell recognition of human 5T4 oncofetal antigen.Smyth, Lucy J C; Elkord, Eyad; Taher, Taher; Jiang, Hui-Rong; Burt, Deborah J; Clayton, Alison J; Van Veelen, Peter A; De Ru, Arnoud; Ossendorp, Ferry; Melief, Cornelis J M; et al. (2006-10-01)The 5T4 oncofetal antigen is expressed by a wide variety of human carcinomas, including colorectal, ovarian and gastric carcinomas. The restricted expression of 5T4 on tumor tissues as well as its implication in tumor progression and bad prognosis makes 5T4 a promising new candidate for immunotherapy. An MVA vaccine encoding 5T4 antigen has been successfully evaluated in preclinical studies in a murine tumor model. Here, we report the generation of human CD8 T cells specific for the 5T4 antigen by stimulation with autologous monocyte derived DC infected with a replication defective adenovirus encoding the 5T4 cDNA (Ad5T4). Analysis of several donors confirms a repertoire of such CD8 responses. In a parallel approach, incorporating the results of proteasome-mediated digestion of 5T4 derived 35-mer peptides and the potential high affinity epitopes predicted by a computer-based algorithm, we identified 8 putative HLA-A*0201-presented CD8 MHC class I epitopes of 5T4 antigen. Two of these generated specific CD8 T cells after restimulation with peptide loaded autologous DC and assay by cytotoxicity and IFN gamma ELISPOT. Moreover these particular peptide generated T cells recognized naturally 5T4 positive tumor cells only if they expressed HLA-A*0201 as judged by IFN gamma ELISPOT or ELISA. Also, HLA-A*0201 CD8 T cells recognized these peptides in a DC-Ad5T4 polyclonal response. In conclusion, there is a repertoire of CD8 T cell recognition of 5T4 in normal human donors and some candidate HLA-A*0201 epitopes have been identified.
Immunotherapy success in prophylaxis cannot predict therapy: prime-boost vaccination against the 5T4 oncofoetal antigenAli, Sumia; Mulryan, Kate; Taher, Taher; Stern, Peter L; CRUK Immunology Group, Paterson Institute of Cancer Research, Christie Hospital NHS Trust, Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 4BX, UK. (2007-02)We have investigated the tumour therapeutic efficacy of homologous and heterologous prime-boost vaccine strategies against the 5T4 oncofoetal antigen, using both replication defective adenovirus expressing human 5T4 (Ad5T4), and retrovirally transduced DC lines (DCh5T4) in a subcutaneous B16 melanoma model (B16h5T4). In naïve mice we show that all vaccine combinations tested can provide significant tumour growth delay. While DCh5T4/Adh5T4 sequence is the best prophylactic regimen (P > 0.0001), it does not demonstrate any therapeutic efficacy in mice with established tumours. In active therapy the Adh5T4/DCh5T4 vaccination sequence is the best treatment regimen (P = 0.0045). In active therapy, we demonstrate that B16h5T4 tumour growth per se induces Th2 polarising immune responses against 5T4, and the success of subsequent vaccination is dependant on altering the polarizing immune responses from Th2 to Th1. We show that the first immunization with Adh5T4 can condition the mice to induce 5T4 specific Th1 immune responses, which can be sustained and subsequently boosted with DCh5T4. In contrast immunisation with DCh5T4 augments Th2 immune responses, such that a subsequent vaccination with Adh5T4 cannot rescue tumour growth. In this case the depletion of CD25(+) regulatory cells after tumour challenge but before immunization can restore therapeutic efficacy. This study highlights that all vaccine vectors are not equal at generating TAA immune responses; in tumour bearing mice the capability of different vaccines to activate the most appropriate anti-tumour immune responses is greatly altered compared to what is found in naïve mice.