Browsing All Christie Publications by Title
Now showing items 8666-8669 of 8669
ZD1839 (IRESSA): a selective EGFR-TK inhibitor.The recent development of highly selective, target-based cancer therapeutics, such as ZD1839 has resulted from a greater understanding of tumor biology. Amongst the most promising of new target-based agents are inhibitors of the epidermal growth factor receptor. ZD 1839 is a potent, selective epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor that has demonstrated promising results in early clinical trials.
ZD1839 (Iressa): for more than just non-small cell lung cancer.ZD1839 (Iressa) is an orally active, selective epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor that blocks signal transduction pathways involved in cell proliferation. Preclinical studies demonstrated that ZD1839 is a promising agent for the treatment of a wide range of tumors and has additive-to-synergistic effects when combined with radiation or chemotherapy in various cell lines and xenografts. Phase I clinical trials have reported that ZD1839 has acceptable tolerability and antitumor activity. In addition to non-small cell lung cancer, phase II/III studies are currently investigating ZD1839 as monotherapy or in combination therapy against prostate, breast, head and neck, gastric, and colorectal tumors.
ZD1839, a selective oral epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is well tolerated and active in patients with solid, malignant tumors: results of a phase I trial.PURPOSE: To investigate the tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor activity of the oral, selective epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor ZD1839 in patients with solid malignant tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was an open, phase I, escalating multiple-dose tolerability and pharmacokinetic trial. ZD1839 was administered once daily for 14 consecutive days followed by 14 days off treatment. Dose escalation started at 50 mg/d and continued to 925 mg or until consistent dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was observed. RESULTS: Sixty-four patients were entered at eight dose levels. The most frequent dose-related grade 1 and 2 adverse events were an acne-like (or folliculitis) rash, nausea, and diarrhea. Three of nine patients treated at 700 mg/d developed DLT (reversible grade 3 diarrhea); grade 3 and 4 events were uncommon. Exposure to ZD1839 was dose proportional, and the mean terminal half-life was 48 hours (range, 37 to 65). Four of 16 patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) had objective partial responses observed from ZD1839 300 to 700 mg/d. Overall, 16 patients remained on study for > or = 3 months, with seven of these patients (five with NSCLC, including three of the patients with partial response) remaining on study for > or = 6 months. CONCLUSION: ZD1839 was well tolerated, with DLT observed at a dose well above that at which antitumor activity was seen. Pharmacokinetic analysis confirmed that ZD1839 was suitable for administration as a once-daily oral tablet formulation. Phase II monotherapy and phase III combination trials in NSCLC are being conducted to investigate further the efficacy, tolerability, and optimal daily dose of ZD1839.
Zoledronic acid significantly improves pain scores and quality of life in breast cancer patients with bone metastases: a randomised, crossover study of community vs hospital bisphosphonate administration.Patients with bone metastases from breast cancer often experience substantial skeletal complications -- including debilitating bone pain -- which negatively affect quality of life. Zoledronic acid (4 mg) has been demonstrated to reduce significantly the risk of skeletal complications in these patients and is administered via a short, 15-min infusion every 3 weeks, allowing the possibility for home administration. This study compared the efficacy and safety of zoledronic acid administered in the community setting vs the hospital setting in breast cancer patients with > or =1 bone metastasis receiving hormonal therapy. After a lead-in phase of three infusions of 4 mg zoledronic acid in the hospital setting, 101 patients were randomized to receive three open-label infusions in the community or hospital setting, followed by three infusions in the opposite venue (a total of nine infusions). The Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) and the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Questionnaire 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) were used to assess potential benefits of zoledronic acid therapy. At study end, analysis of the BPI showed significant reductions in worst pain (P=0.008) and average pain in the last 7 days (P=0.039), and interference with general activity (P=0.012). In each case, there were significantly greater improvements in pain scores after treatment in the community setting compared with the hospital crossover setting for worst pain (P=0.021), average pain (P=0.003), and interference with general activity (P=0.001). Overall global health status showed a significant median improvement of 8.3% (P=0.013) at study end. Physical, emotional, and social functioning also showed significant overall improvement (P=0.013, 0.005, and 0.043, respectively). Furthermore, physical, role, and social functioning showed significantly greater improvements after treatment in the community setting compared with the hospital crossover setting (P=0.018, 0.001, and 0.026, respectively). There was no difference between hospital and community administration in renal or other toxicity, with zoledronic acid being well tolerated in both treatment settings. These data confirm the safety and quality-of-life benefits of zoledronic acid in breast cancer patients with bone metastases, particularly when administered in the community setting.