Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCunningham, D
dc.contributor.authorLang, I
dc.contributor.authorMarcuello, E
dc.contributor.authorLorusso, V
dc.contributor.authorOcvirk, J
dc.contributor.authorShin, D
dc.contributor.authorJonker, D
dc.contributor.authorOsborne, S
dc.contributor.authorAndre, N
dc.contributor.authorWaterkamp, D
dc.contributor.authorSaunders, Mark P
dc.date.accessioned2013-12-20T10:42:16Z
dc.date.available2013-12-20T10:42:16Z
dc.date.issued2013-10
dc.identifier.citationBevacizumab plus Capecitabine versus Capecitabine alone in elderly patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer (AVEX): an open-label, randomised phase 3 trial. 2013, 14 (11):1077-85 Lancet Oncolen
dc.identifier.issn1474-5488
dc.identifier.pmid24028813
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70154-2
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10541/308832
dc.description.abstractElderly patients are often under-represented in clinical trials of metastatic colorectal cancer. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab plus capecitabine compared with capecitabine alone in elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
dc.language.isoenen
dc.rightsArchived with thanks to The lancet oncologyen
dc.titleBevacizumab plus Capecitabine versus Capecitabine alone in elderly patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer (AVEX): an open-label, randomised phase 3 trial.en
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.departmentRoyal Marsden Hospital, London, UK.en
dc.identifier.journalThe Lancet Oncologyen
html.description.abstractElderly patients are often under-represented in clinical trials of metastatic colorectal cancer. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab plus capecitabine compared with capecitabine alone in elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record