Biphasic and monophasic repair: comparative implications for biologically equivalent dose calculations in pulsed dose rate brachytherapy of cervical carcinoma.
Affiliation
Beatson Oncology Centre, Gartnavel Hospital, Glasgow, UK.Issue Date
2013-09
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
To consider the implications of the use of biphasic rather than monophasic repair in calculations of biologically-equivalent doses for pulsed-dose-rate brachytherapy of cervix carcinoma.Citation
Biphasic and monophasic repair: comparative implications for biologically equivalent dose calculations in pulsed dose rate brachytherapy of cervical carcinoma. 2013, 86 (1029):20130288 Br J RadiolJournal
The British Journal of RadiologyDOI
10.1259/bjr.20130288PubMed ID
23934965Type
ArticleLanguage
enISSN
1748-880Xae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1259/bjr.20130288
Scopus Count
Collections
Related articles
- Clinical implications of incomplete repair parameters for rat spinal cord: the feasibility of large doses per fraction in PDR and HDR brachytherapy.
- Authors: Pop LA, Millar WT, Visser AG, van der Kogel AJ
- Issue date: 2001 Sep 1
- Pulsed dose rate and fractionated high dose rate brachytherapy: choice of brachytherapy schedules to replace low dose rate treatments.
- Authors: Visser AG, van den Aardweg GJ, Levendag PC
- Issue date: 1996 Jan 15
- The influence of the number of fractions and bi-exponential repair kinetics on biological equivalence in pulsed brachytherapy.
- Authors: Millar WT, Hendry JH, Canney PA
- Issue date: 1996 May
- Biological effect of pulsed dose rate brachytherapy with stepping sources if short half-times of repair are present in tissues.
- Authors: Fowler JF, Van Limbergen EF
- Issue date: 1997 Mar 1
- Biologically effective doses in medium dose rate brachytherapy of cancer of the cervix.
- Authors: Leborgne F, Fowler JF, Leborgne JH, Zubizarreta E, Chappell R
- Issue date: 1997