Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBeyer, J
dc.contributor.authorAlbers, P
dc.contributor.authorAltena, R
dc.contributor.authorAparicio, J
dc.contributor.authorBokemeyer, C
dc.contributor.authorBusch, J
dc.contributor.authorCathomas, R
dc.contributor.authorCavallin-Stahl, E
dc.contributor.authorClarke, Noel W
dc.contributor.authorClaßen, J
dc.contributor.authorCohn-Cedermark, G
dc.contributor.authorDahl, A A
dc.contributor.authorDaugaard, G
dc.contributor.authorDe Giorgi, U
dc.contributor.authorDe Santis, M
dc.contributor.authorDe Wit, M
dc.contributor.authorDe Wit, R
dc.contributor.authorDieckmann, K P
dc.contributor.authorFenner, M
dc.contributor.authorFizazi, K
dc.contributor.authorFlechon, A
dc.contributor.authorFossa, S D
dc.contributor.authorGermá Lluch, J R
dc.contributor.authorGietema, J A
dc.contributor.authorGillessen, S
dc.contributor.authorGiwercman, A
dc.contributor.authorHartmann, J T
dc.contributor.authorHeidenreich, A
dc.contributor.authorHentrich, M
dc.contributor.authorHonecker, F
dc.contributor.authorHorwich, A
dc.contributor.authorHuddart, R A
dc.contributor.authorKliesch, S
dc.contributor.authorKollmannsberger, C
dc.contributor.authorKrege, S
dc.contributor.authorLaguna, M P
dc.contributor.authorLooijenga, L H
dc.contributor.authorLorch, A
dc.contributor.authorLotz, J P
dc.contributor.authorMayer, F
dc.contributor.authorNecchi, A
dc.contributor.authorNicolai, N
dc.contributor.authorNuver, J
dc.contributor.authorOechsle, K
dc.contributor.authorOldenburg, J
dc.contributor.authorOosterhuis, J W
dc.contributor.authorPowles, T
dc.contributor.authorRajpert-De Meyts, E
dc.contributor.authorRick, O
dc.contributor.authorRosti, G
dc.contributor.authorSalvioni, R
dc.contributor.authorSchrader, M
dc.contributor.authorSchweyer, S
dc.contributor.authorSedlmayer, F
dc.contributor.authorSohaib, A
dc.contributor.authorSouchon, R
dc.contributor.authorTandstad, T
dc.contributor.authorWinter, C
dc.contributor.authorWittekind, C
dc.date.accessioned2013-06-14T15:24:29Z
dc.date.available2013-06-14T15:24:29Z
dc.date.issued2013-04
dc.identifier.citationMaintaining success, reducing treatment burden, focusing on survivorship: highlights from the third European consensus conference on diagnosis and treatment of germ-cell cancer. 2013, 24 (4):878-88 Ann Oncolen_GB
dc.identifier.issn1569-8041
dc.identifier.pmid23152360
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/annonc/mds579
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10541/293996
dc.description.abstractIn November 2011, the Third European Consensus Conference on Diagnosis and Treatment of Germ-Cell Cancer (GCC) was held in Berlin, Germany. This third conference followed similar meetings in 2003 (Essen, Germany) and 2006 (Amsterdam, The Netherlands) [Schmoll H-J, Souchon R, Krege S et al. European consensus on diagnosis and treatment of germ-cell cancer: a report of the European Germ-Cell Cancer Consensus Group (EGCCCG). Ann Oncol 2004; 15: 1377-1399; Krege S, Beyer J, Souchon R et al. European consensus conference on diagnosis and treatment of germ-cell cancer: a report of the second meeting of the European Germ-Cell Cancer Consensus group (EGCCCG): part I. Eur Urol 2008; 53: 478-496; Krege S, Beyer J, Souchon R et al. European consensus conference on diagnosis and treatment of germ-cell cancer: a report of the second meeting of the European Germ-Cell Cancer Consensus group (EGCCCG): part II. Eur Urol 2008; 53: 497-513]. A panel of 56 of 60 invited GCC experts from all across Europe discussed all aspects on diagnosis and treatment of GCC, with a particular focus on acute and late toxic effects as well as on survivorship issues. The panel consisted of oncologists, urologic surgeons, radiooncologists, pathologists and basic scientists, who are all actively involved in care of GCC patients. Panelists were chosen based on the publication activity in recent years. Before the meeting, panelists were asked to review the literature published since 2006 in 20 major areas concerning all aspects of diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of GCC patients, and to prepare an updated version of the previous recommendations to be discussed at the conference. In addition, ∼50 E-vote questions were drafted and presented at the conference to address the most controversial areas for a poll of expert opinions. Here, we present the main recommendations and controversies of this meeting. The votes of the panelists are added as online supplements.
dc.language.isoenen
dc.rightsArchived with thanks to Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology / ESMOen_GB
dc.titleMaintaining success, reducing treatment burden, focusing on survivorship: highlights from the third European consensus conference on diagnosis and treatment of germ-cell cancer.en
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Vivantes Klinikum Am Urban, Berlin.en_GB
dc.identifier.journalAnnals of Oncologyen_GB
html.description.abstractIn November 2011, the Third European Consensus Conference on Diagnosis and Treatment of Germ-Cell Cancer (GCC) was held in Berlin, Germany. This third conference followed similar meetings in 2003 (Essen, Germany) and 2006 (Amsterdam, The Netherlands) [Schmoll H-J, Souchon R, Krege S et al. European consensus on diagnosis and treatment of germ-cell cancer: a report of the European Germ-Cell Cancer Consensus Group (EGCCCG). Ann Oncol 2004; 15: 1377-1399; Krege S, Beyer J, Souchon R et al. European consensus conference on diagnosis and treatment of germ-cell cancer: a report of the second meeting of the European Germ-Cell Cancer Consensus group (EGCCCG): part I. Eur Urol 2008; 53: 478-496; Krege S, Beyer J, Souchon R et al. European consensus conference on diagnosis and treatment of germ-cell cancer: a report of the second meeting of the European Germ-Cell Cancer Consensus group (EGCCCG): part II. Eur Urol 2008; 53: 497-513]. A panel of 56 of 60 invited GCC experts from all across Europe discussed all aspects on diagnosis and treatment of GCC, with a particular focus on acute and late toxic effects as well as on survivorship issues. The panel consisted of oncologists, urologic surgeons, radiooncologists, pathologists and basic scientists, who are all actively involved in care of GCC patients. Panelists were chosen based on the publication activity in recent years. Before the meeting, panelists were asked to review the literature published since 2006 in 20 major areas concerning all aspects of diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of GCC patients, and to prepare an updated version of the previous recommendations to be discussed at the conference. In addition, ∼50 E-vote questions were drafted and presented at the conference to address the most controversial areas for a poll of expert opinions. Here, we present the main recommendations and controversies of this meeting. The votes of the panelists are added as online supplements.


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record