Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLowe, A
dc.contributor.authorLaasch, H
dc.contributor.authorStephenson, S
dc.contributor.authorButterfield, C
dc.contributor.authorGoodwin, M
dc.contributor.authorKay, C L
dc.contributor.authorGlancy, S
dc.contributor.authorJackson, S
dc.contributor.authorBrown, D
dc.contributor.authorMcLean, P
dc.contributor.authorKeanie, J
dc.contributor.authorThrower, A
dc.contributor.authorBriggs, R
dc.contributor.authorPunekar, S
dc.contributor.authorKrishnan, S
dc.contributor.authorThomas, B
dc.contributor.authorYap, K
dc.contributor.authorMullan, Damian
dc.contributor.authorMaskell, G
dc.contributor.authorHancock, J
dc.contributor.authorEdwards, A
dc.contributor.authorDodds, N
dc.contributor.authorPhilips, A
dc.contributor.authorHeyward, S
dc.contributor.authorTolan, D
dc.contributor.authorHarris, K
dc.contributor.authorMoss, E
dc.contributor.authorHussain, F
dc.contributor.authorLopez, A J
dc.contributor.authorKennedy, P
dc.contributor.authorEllis, P
dc.contributor.authorCollins, A
dc.contributor.authorDoyle, T
dc.contributor.authorThompson, P
dc.contributor.authorJohnston, M
dc.contributor.authorRichenberg, J
dc.contributor.authorVallance, K
dc.contributor.authorDyer, J
dc.contributor.authorHigginson, T
dc.contributor.authorAtchley, J
dc.contributor.authorCorr, C
dc.contributor.authorRobinson, M
dc.contributor.authorFleming, D
dc.contributor.authorMcBride, K
dc.contributor.authorBhat, R
dc.contributor.authorDocherty, S
dc.contributor.authorChowdury, P
dc.date.accessioned2012-12-12T18:18:32Z
dc.date.available2012-12-12T18:18:32Z
dc.date.issued2012-09
dc.identifier.citationMulticentre survey of radiologically inserted gastrostomy feeding tube (RIG) in the UK. 2012, 67 (9):843-54 Clin Radiolen_GB
dc.identifier.issn1365-229X
dc.identifier.pmid22682703
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.crad.2012.01.014
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10541/259210
dc.description.abstractTo evaluate the variance in current UK clinical practice and clinical outcomes for direct percutaneous radiologically inserted gastrostomy (RIG).
dc.language.isoenen
dc.rightsArchived with thanks to Clinical radiologyen_GB
dc.subject.meshAdolescent
dc.subject.meshAdult
dc.subject.meshAged
dc.subject.meshAged, 80 and over
dc.subject.meshAntibiotic Prophylaxis
dc.subject.meshFemale
dc.subject.meshFollow-Up Studies
dc.subject.meshGastropexy
dc.subject.meshGastrostomy
dc.subject.meshGreat Britain
dc.subject.meshHumans
dc.subject.meshIntubation, Gastrointestinal
dc.subject.meshMale
dc.subject.meshMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
dc.subject.meshMiddle Aged
dc.subject.meshPhysical Fitness
dc.subject.meshPostoperative Complications
dc.subject.meshProspective Studies
dc.subject.meshRadiography, Interventional
dc.subject.meshStomach
dc.subject.meshSurgery, Computer-Assisted
dc.subject.meshSurvival Analysis
dc.subject.meshTreatment Outcome
dc.subject.meshYoung Adult
dc.titleMulticentre survey of radiologically inserted gastrostomy feeding tube (RIG) in the UK.en
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.departmentBradford Royal Infirmary, Bradford, UK.en_GB
dc.identifier.journalClinical Radiologyen_GB
html.description.abstractTo evaluate the variance in current UK clinical practice and clinical outcomes for direct percutaneous radiologically inserted gastrostomy (RIG).


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record