Clinical and economic impact of adhesiolysis during repeat cesarean delivery.
dc.contributor.author | Sikirica, V | |
dc.contributor.author | Broder, M S | |
dc.contributor.author | Chang, E | |
dc.contributor.author | Hinoul, P | |
dc.contributor.author | Robinson, D | |
dc.contributor.author | Wilson, Malcolm S | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-06-26T10:52:39Z | |
dc.date.available | 2012-06-26T10:52:39Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2012-06 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Clinical and economic impact of adhesiolysis during repeat cesarean delivery. 2012, 91 (6):719-25 Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand | en_GB |
dc.identifier.issn | 1600-0412 | |
dc.identifier.pmid | 22404156 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01395.x | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10541/230777 | |
dc.description.abstract | Objective. To estimate adhesiolysis rates at cesarean delivery (CD) and to estimate costs and clinical implications of performing adhesiolysis at repeat CD. Design. Retrospective cohort using secondary data. Setting. Over 500 acute care hospitals in the USA. Population. Women ≥15 years old with a medical claim for CD between 1 January 2007 and 31 December 2008 who were treated in a hospital that contributed data to the Premier Perspective™ database. Methods. Using data from hospital discharge records, rates of adhesiolysis at the time of CD were calculated. Among patients with repeat CD, a propensity score was used to create matched cohorts with and without adhesiolysis. Unadjusted rates and means were compared between these cohorts. Main outcome measures. Cost, length of stay and selected clinical complications between repeat CD patients with and without adhesiolysis. Results. Adhesiolysis was performed in 0.5% of primary and 6.1% of repeat CD patients. Using propensity scores, 10 261 women who experienced repeat CD with adhesiolysis were matched to 10 261 control women. Hospital cost ($5739 vs. $5448), length of stay (2.97 vs. 2.88 days) and operative time (84.0 vs. 74.2 min) were significantly greater in the adhesiolysis than in the non-adhesiolysis group (p < 0.01 for all comparisons), as was the overall complication rate (6.3 vs. 3.5%). Conclusions. Adhesiolysis rates were higher in repeat compared with primary CD. Among repeat CD patients, costs and complications were higher in the adhesiolysis group. Reducing adhesion formation after primary CD could reduce cost and complications at the time of repeat CD. | |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.rights | Archived with thanks to Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica | en_GB |
dc.title | Clinical and economic impact of adhesiolysis during repeat cesarean delivery. | en |
dc.type | Article | en |
dc.contributor.department | Ethicon, Inc., Somerville, NJ, USA Partnership for Health Analytic Research (PHAR), LLC, Beverly Hills, CA, USA The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK. | en_GB |
dc.identifier.journal | Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica | en_GB |
html.description.abstract | Objective. To estimate adhesiolysis rates at cesarean delivery (CD) and to estimate costs and clinical implications of performing adhesiolysis at repeat CD. Design. Retrospective cohort using secondary data. Setting. Over 500 acute care hospitals in the USA. Population. Women ≥15 years old with a medical claim for CD between 1 January 2007 and 31 December 2008 who were treated in a hospital that contributed data to the Premier Perspective™ database. Methods. Using data from hospital discharge records, rates of adhesiolysis at the time of CD were calculated. Among patients with repeat CD, a propensity score was used to create matched cohorts with and without adhesiolysis. Unadjusted rates and means were compared between these cohorts. Main outcome measures. Cost, length of stay and selected clinical complications between repeat CD patients with and without adhesiolysis. Results. Adhesiolysis was performed in 0.5% of primary and 6.1% of repeat CD patients. Using propensity scores, 10 261 women who experienced repeat CD with adhesiolysis were matched to 10 261 control women. Hospital cost ($5739 vs. $5448), length of stay (2.97 vs. 2.88 days) and operative time (84.0 vs. 74.2 min) were significantly greater in the adhesiolysis than in the non-adhesiolysis group (p < 0.01 for all comparisons), as was the overall complication rate (6.3 vs. 3.5%). Conclusions. Adhesiolysis rates were higher in repeat compared with primary CD. Among repeat CD patients, costs and complications were higher in the adhesiolysis group. Reducing adhesion formation after primary CD could reduce cost and complications at the time of repeat CD. |