• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • The Christie Research Publications Repository
    • All Christie Publications
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • The Christie Research Publications Repository
    • All Christie Publications
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of ChristieCommunitiesTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsThis CollectionTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Local Links

    The Christie WebsiteChristie Library and Knowledge Service

    Statistics

    Display statistics

    The readout thickness versus the measured thickness for a range of screen film mammography and full-field digital mammography units.

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Authors
    Hauge, I
    Hogg, P
    Szczepura, K
    Connolly, P
    McGill, George
    Mercer, C
    Affiliation
    Oslo and Akershus University College of Applied Sciences, Department of Radiography and Dental Technology, St. Olavs plass, NO-0130 Oslo, Norway. ingrid-helen.ryste-hauge@hioa.no
    Issue Date
    2012-01
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    To establish a simple method to determine breast readout accuracy on mammography units.
    Citation
    The readout thickness versus the measured thickness for a range of screen film mammography and full-field digital mammography units. 2012, 39 (1):263-71 Med Phys
    Journal
    Medical Physics
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10541/226156
    DOI
    10.1118/1.3663579
    PubMed ID
    22225296
    Type
    Article
    Language
    en
    ISSN
    0094-2405
    ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
    10.1118/1.3663579
    Scopus Count
    Collections
    All Christie Publications

    entitlement

    Related articles

    • Optimization of technique factors for a silicon diode array full-field digital mammography system and comparison to screen-film mammography with matched average glandular dose.
    • Authors: Berns EA, Hendrick RE, Cutter GR
    • Issue date: 2003 Mar
    • Comparison of full-field digital mammography to screen-film mammography with respect to contrast and spatial resolution in tissue equivalent breast phantoms.
    • Authors: Kuzmiak CM, Pisano ED, Cole EB, Zeng D, Burns CB, Roberto C, Pavic D, Lee Y, Seo BK, Koomen M, Washburn D
    • Issue date: 2005 Oct
    • Analysis of motion during the breast clamping phase of mammography.
    • Authors: Ma WK, McEntee MF, Mercer C, Kelly J, Millington S, Hogg P
    • Issue date: 2016
    • Comparison of acquisition parameters and breast dose in digital mammography and screen-film mammography in the American College of Radiology Imaging Network digital mammographic imaging screening trial.
    • Authors: Hendrick RE, Pisano ED, Averbukh A, Moran C, Berns EA, Yaffe MJ, Herman B, Acharyya S, Gatsonis C
    • Issue date: 2010 Feb
    • Dose reduction in full-field digital mammography: an anthropomorphic breast phantom study.
    • Authors: Obenauer S, Hermann KP, Grabbe E
    • Issue date: 2003 Jul
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2023)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.