Authors
Brettle, AMaden-Jenkins, M
Anderson, L
McNally, R J Q
Pratchett, T
Tancock, J
Thornton, D
Webb, Anne E
Affiliation
School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Salford, Salford.Issue Date
2011-03
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Previous systematic reviews have indicated limited evidence and poor quality evaluations of clinical librarian (CL) services. Rigorous evaluations should demonstrate the value of CL services, but guidance is needed before this can be achieved.Citation
Evaluating clinical librarian services: a systematic review. 2011, 28 (1):3-22 Health Info Libr JJournal
Health Information and Libraries JournalDOI
10.1111/j.1471-1842.2010.00925.xPubMed ID
21314890Type
ArticleLanguage
enISSN
1471-1842ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1111/j.1471-1842.2010.00925.x
Scopus Count
Collections
Related articles
- Building capacity for librarian support and addressing collaboration challenges by formalizing library systematic review services.
- Authors: McKeown S, Ross-White A
- Issue date: 2019 Jul
- Practitioner commentary on: Fridén, K. The librarian as a teacher: experiences from a problem-based setting. Health Libraries Review 1996, 13, 3-7.
- Authors: Harker E
- Issue date: 2008 Dec
- The Librarian's Contribution to Continuing Medical Education.
- Authors: Gerber AL
- Issue date: 2017 Oct-Dec
- Examining care navigation: librarian participation in a team-based approach?
- Authors: Nix AT, Huber JT, Shapiro RM 2nd, Pfeifle A
- Issue date: 2016 Apr
- Future of academic and health libraries: personal perspectives.
- Authors: Haines M, Marshall JG
- Issue date: 2008 Dec