• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • The Christie Research Publications Repository
    • All Christie Publications
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • The Christie Research Publications Repository
    • All Christie Publications
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of ChristieCommunitiesTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsThis CollectionTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsProfilesView

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Local Links

    The Christie WebsiteChristie Library and Knowledge Service

    Statistics

    Display statistics

    How can we improve our understanding of cardiovascular safety liabilities to develop safer medicines?

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Authors
    Laverty, H G
    Benson, C
    Cartwright, E J
    Cross, M J
    Garland, C
    Hammond, T
    Holloway, C
    McMahon, N
    Milligan, J
    Park, B K
    Pirmohamed, M
    Pollard, C
    Radford, John A
    Roome, N
    Sager, P
    Singh, S
    Suter, T
    Suter, W
    Trafford, A
    Volders, P G A
    Wallis, R
    Weaver, R
    York, M
    Valentin, J P
    Show allShow less
    Affiliation
    MRC Centre for Drug Safety Science, Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, The University of Liverpool, Merseyside, UK.
    Issue Date
    2011-06
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Given that cardiovascular safety liabilities remain a major cause of drug attrition during preclinical and clinical development, adverse drug reactions, and post-approval withdrawal of medicines, the Medical Research Council Centre for Drug Safety Science hosted a workshop to discuss current challenges in determining, understanding and addressing 'Cardiovascular Toxicity of Medicines'. This article summarizes the key discussions from the workshop that aimed to address three major questions: (i) what are the key cardiovascular safety liabilities in drug discovery, drug development and clinical practice? (ii) how good are preclinical and clinical strategies for detecting cardiovascular liabilities? and (iii) do we have a mechanistic understanding of these liabilities? It was concluded that in order to understand, address and ultimately reduce cardiovascular safety liabilities of new therapeutic agents there is an urgent need to: • Fully characterize the incidence, prevalence and impact of drug-induced cardiovascular issues at all stages of the drug development process. • Ascertain the predictive value of existing non-clinical models and assays towards the clinical outcome. • Understand the mechanistic basis of cardiovascular liabilities; by addressing areas where it is currently not possible to predict clinical outcome based on preclinical safety data. • Provide scientists in all disciplines with additional skills to enable them to better integrate preclinical and clinical data and to better understand the biological and clinical significance of observed changes. • Develop more appropriate, highly relevant and predictive tools and assays to identify and wherever feasible to eliminate cardiovascular safety liabilities from molecules and wherever appropriate to develop clinically relevant and reliable safety biomarkers.
    Citation
    How can we improve our understanding of cardiovascular safety liabilities to develop safer medicines? 2011, 163 (4):675-93 Br. J. Pharmacol.
    Journal
    British Journal of Pharmacology
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10541/200909
    DOI
    10.1111/j.1476-5381.2011.01255.x
    PubMed ID
    21306581
    Type
    Article
    Language
    en
    ISSN
    1476-5381
    ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
    10.1111/j.1476-5381.2011.01255.x
    Scopus Count
    Collections
    All Christie Publications
    Medical Oncology

    entitlement

    Related articles

    • Value of non-clinical cardiac repolarization assays in supporting the discovery and development of safer medicines.
    • Authors: Valentin JP, Pollard C, Lainée P, Hammond T
    • Issue date: 2010 Jan
    • A call for more integrated cardiovascular safety assessment.
    • Authors: Pettit SD, Berridge B, Sarazan RD
    • Issue date: 2010 Jan-Feb
    • Test of the usefulness of a paradigm to identify potential cardiovascular liabilities of four test articles with varying pharmacological properties in anesthetized guinea pigs.
    • Authors: Kijtawornrat A, Ueyama Y, del Rio C, Sawangkoon S, Buranakarl C, Chaiyabutr N, Hamlin RL
    • Issue date: 2014 Feb
    • Exploratory toxicology as an integrated part of drug discovery. Part I: Why and how.
    • Authors: Hornberg JJ, Laursen M, Brenden N, Persson M, Thougaard AV, Toft DB, Mow T
    • Issue date: 2014 Aug
    • Exploratory safety pharmacology: a new safety paradigm to de-risk drug candidates prior to selection for regulatory science investigations.
    • Authors: Cavero I
    • Issue date: 2009 Nov
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2025)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.