How can we improve our understanding of cardiovascular safety liabilities to develop safer medicines?
Authors
Laverty, H GBenson, C
Cartwright, E J
Cross, M J
Garland, C
Hammond, T
Holloway, C
McMahon, N
Milligan, J
Park, B K
Pirmohamed, M
Pollard, C
Radford, John A
Roome, N
Sager, P
Singh, S
Suter, T
Suter, W
Trafford, A
Volders, P G A
Wallis, R
Weaver, R
York, M
Valentin, J P
Affiliation
MRC Centre for Drug Safety Science, Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, The University of Liverpool, Merseyside, UK.Issue Date
2011-06
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Given that cardiovascular safety liabilities remain a major cause of drug attrition during preclinical and clinical development, adverse drug reactions, and post-approval withdrawal of medicines, the Medical Research Council Centre for Drug Safety Science hosted a workshop to discuss current challenges in determining, understanding and addressing 'Cardiovascular Toxicity of Medicines'. This article summarizes the key discussions from the workshop that aimed to address three major questions: (i) what are the key cardiovascular safety liabilities in drug discovery, drug development and clinical practice? (ii) how good are preclinical and clinical strategies for detecting cardiovascular liabilities? and (iii) do we have a mechanistic understanding of these liabilities? It was concluded that in order to understand, address and ultimately reduce cardiovascular safety liabilities of new therapeutic agents there is an urgent need to: • Fully characterize the incidence, prevalence and impact of drug-induced cardiovascular issues at all stages of the drug development process. • Ascertain the predictive value of existing non-clinical models and assays towards the clinical outcome. • Understand the mechanistic basis of cardiovascular liabilities; by addressing areas where it is currently not possible to predict clinical outcome based on preclinical safety data. • Provide scientists in all disciplines with additional skills to enable them to better integrate preclinical and clinical data and to better understand the biological and clinical significance of observed changes. • Develop more appropriate, highly relevant and predictive tools and assays to identify and wherever feasible to eliminate cardiovascular safety liabilities from molecules and wherever appropriate to develop clinically relevant and reliable safety biomarkers.Citation
How can we improve our understanding of cardiovascular safety liabilities to develop safer medicines? 2011, 163 (4):675-93 Br. J. Pharmacol.Journal
British Journal of PharmacologyDOI
10.1111/j.1476-5381.2011.01255.xPubMed ID
21306581Type
ArticleLanguage
enISSN
1476-5381ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1111/j.1476-5381.2011.01255.x
Scopus Count
Related articles
- A call for more integrated cardiovascular safety assessment.
- Authors: Pettit SD, Berridge B, Sarazan RD
- Issue date: 2010 Jan-Feb
- Value of non-clinical cardiac repolarization assays in supporting the discovery and development of safer medicines.
- Authors: Valentin JP, Pollard C, Lainée P, Hammond T
- Issue date: 2010 Jan
- Test of the usefulness of a paradigm to identify potential cardiovascular liabilities of four test articles with varying pharmacological properties in anesthetized guinea pigs.
- Authors: Kijtawornrat A, Ueyama Y, del Rio C, Sawangkoon S, Buranakarl C, Chaiyabutr N, Hamlin RL
- Issue date: 2014 Feb
- Exploratory toxicology as an integrated part of drug discovery. Part I: Why and how.
- Authors: Hornberg JJ, Laursen M, Brenden N, Persson M, Thougaard AV, Toft DB, Mow T
- Issue date: 2014 Aug
- Exploratory safety pharmacology: a new safety paradigm to de-risk drug candidates prior to selection for regulatory science investigations.
- Authors: Cavero I
- Issue date: 2009 Nov