Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHurd, K Een
dc.contributor.authorPalmer, Michael Ken
dc.contributor.authorHull, Sheilaen
dc.date.accessioned2011-07-12T16:57:12Z
dc.date.available2011-07-12T16:57:12Z
dc.date.issued1977-11
dc.identifier.citationA comparative study for the enumeration of peripheral blood white cell counts below 2.0 x 10(9)/1 using counting chambers and the Coulter Counter model "S". 1977, 30 (11):1005-6 J Clin Patholen
dc.identifier.issn0021-9746
dc.identifier.pmid591637
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/jcp.30.11.1005
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10541/135894
dc.description.abstractLow white cell counts are performed in many laboratories by a visual method as the method of choice. In this study, the visual count has been compared to that obtained by the Coulter Model "S". The results obtained by the two methods show very close correlation, thus allowing the Coulter Model "S" to be used with confidence for all low white cell counts provided certain precautions are taken.
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subject.meshHumans
dc.subject.meshLeukocyte Count
dc.titleA comparative study for the enumeration of peripheral blood white cell counts below 2.0 x 10(9)/1 using counting chambers and the Coulter Counter model "S".en
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.departmentChristie Hospital and Holt Radium Institute, Withington, Manchester M20 9BX, UKen
dc.identifier.journalJournal of Clinical Pathologyen
html.description.abstractLow white cell counts are performed in many laboratories by a visual method as the method of choice. In this study, the visual count has been compared to that obtained by the Coulter Model "S". The results obtained by the two methods show very close correlation, thus allowing the Coulter Model "S" to be used with confidence for all low white cell counts provided certain precautions are taken.


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record