DNA repair, DNA synthesis and cell cycle delay in human lymphoblastoid cells differentially sensitive to the cytotoxic effects of nitrogen mustard.
dc.contributor.author | Dean, S W | |
dc.contributor.author | Fox, Margaret | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2011-03-13T00:13:02Z | |
dc.date.available | 2011-03-13T00:13:02Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2011-03-13T00:13:02Z | |
dc.identifier.citation | DNA repair, DNA synthesis and cell cycle delay in human lymphoblastoid cells differentially sensitive to the cytotoxic effects of nitrogen mustard., 132 (1-2):63-72 Mutat Res | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 0027-5107 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 10.1016/0167-8817(84)90067-1 | |
dc.identifier.pmid | 6472319 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10541/124437 | |
dc.description.abstract | Two cloned human lymphoblastoid cell lines, Raji and TK6, differ in their sensitivity to the cytotoxic effects of nitrogen mustard (HN2). Raji cells exhibit a biphasic response with an initial D value of 0.06 microgram/ml and a final slope of 0.25 microgram/ml. TK6 cells were considerably more sensitive, D0 value 0.02 microgram/ml. Dose-response relationships for delay in cell cycle progression were measured using flow cytometry. Delay in S-phase traverse was concentration-dependent in both cell lines, and at a given concentration was 2-fold greater in TK6 than in Raji. Numbers of crosslinks (determined by alkaline elution) increased linearly with increasing HN2 concentration and were approximately 2-fold higher in TK6 than in Raji. At equal levels of DNA crosslinks, rates of removal were similar in both cell lines. Inhibition of [3H]TdR uptake was concentration-dependent and the extent of inhibition was similar in both cell lines. Recovery from HN2-induced inhibition of cell cycle progression markedly preceded recovery from inhibition of [3H]TdR incorporation suggesting that nucleotide pools are markedly perturbed in HN2-treated cells. The difference in sensitivity of these two cell lines cannot be adequately explained by differences in amounts of initial DNA damage, rates of repair, differential S-phase delay or rate of loss of DNA crosslinks. | |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.subject.mesh | Burkitt Lymphoma | |
dc.subject.mesh | Cell Cycle | |
dc.subject.mesh | Cell Line | |
dc.subject.mesh | Cell Survival | |
dc.subject.mesh | DNA Repair | |
dc.subject.mesh | DNA Replication | |
dc.subject.mesh | Flow Cytometry | |
dc.subject.mesh | Humans | |
dc.subject.mesh | Lymphocytes | |
dc.subject.mesh | Mechlorethamine | |
dc.title | DNA repair, DNA synthesis and cell cycle delay in human lymphoblastoid cells differentially sensitive to the cytotoxic effects of nitrogen mustard. | en |
dc.type | Article | en |
dc.contributor.department | Paterson Laboratories, CHristie Hospital and Holt Radium Institute, Manchester, M20 9BX, United Kingdom | en |
dc.identifier.journal | Mutation Research | en |
html.description.abstract | Two cloned human lymphoblastoid cell lines, Raji and TK6, differ in their sensitivity to the cytotoxic effects of nitrogen mustard (HN2). Raji cells exhibit a biphasic response with an initial D value of 0.06 microgram/ml and a final slope of 0.25 microgram/ml. TK6 cells were considerably more sensitive, D0 value 0.02 microgram/ml. Dose-response relationships for delay in cell cycle progression were measured using flow cytometry. Delay in S-phase traverse was concentration-dependent in both cell lines, and at a given concentration was 2-fold greater in TK6 than in Raji. Numbers of crosslinks (determined by alkaline elution) increased linearly with increasing HN2 concentration and were approximately 2-fold higher in TK6 than in Raji. At equal levels of DNA crosslinks, rates of removal were similar in both cell lines. Inhibition of [3H]TdR uptake was concentration-dependent and the extent of inhibition was similar in both cell lines. Recovery from HN2-induced inhibition of cell cycle progression markedly preceded recovery from inhibition of [3H]TdR incorporation suggesting that nucleotide pools are markedly perturbed in HN2-treated cells. The difference in sensitivity of these two cell lines cannot be adequately explained by differences in amounts of initial DNA damage, rates of repair, differential S-phase delay or rate of loss of DNA crosslinks. |