• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • The Christie Research Publications Repository
    • All Christie Publications
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • The Christie Research Publications Repository
    • All Christie Publications
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of ChristieCommunitiesTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsThis CollectionTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsProfilesView

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Local Links

    The Christie WebsiteChristie Library and Knowledge Service

    Statistics

    Display statistics

    Concordance between four European centres of PET reporting criteria designed for use in multicentre trials in Hodgkin lymphoma.

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Authors
    Barrington, S F
    Qian, W
    Somer, E J
    Franceschetto, A
    Bagni, B
    Brun, E
    Almquist, H
    Loft, A
    Højgaard, L
    Federico, M
    Gallamini, A
    Smith, P
    Johnson, P
    Radford, John A
    O'Doherty, M J
    Show allShow less
    Affiliation
    PET Imaging Centre at St Thomas', Kings College London Division of Imaging, Lambeth Palace Road, London SE1 7EH, UK. sally.barrington@kcl.ac.uk
    Issue Date
    2010-10
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    PURPOSE: To determine if PET reporting criteria for the Response Adapted Treatment in Hodgkin Lymphoma (RATHL) trial could enable satisfactory agreement to be reached between 'core' laboratories operating in different countries. METHODS: Four centres reported scans from 50 patients with stage II-IV HL, acquired before and after two cycles of Adriamycin/bleomycin/vinblastine/dacarbazine. A five-point scale was used to score response scans using 'normal' mediastinum and liver as reference levels. Centres read scans independently of each other. The level of agreement between centres was determined assuming (1) that uptake in sites involved at diagnosis that was higher than liver uptake represented disease (conservative reading), and (2) that uptake in sites involved at diagnosis that was higher than mediastinal uptake represented disease (sensitive reading). RESULTS: There was agreement that the response scan was 'positive' or 'negative' for lymphoma in 44 patients with a conservative reading and in 41 patients with a sensitive reading. Kappa was 0.85 (95% CI 0.74-0.96) for conservative reading and 0.79 (95% CI 0.67-0.90) for sensitive reading. Agreement was reached in 46 and 44 patients after discussion for the conservative and sensitive readings, respectively. CONCLUSION: The criteria developed for reporting in the RATHL trial are sufficiently robust to be used in a multicentre setting.
    Citation
    Concordance between four European centres of PET reporting criteria designed for use in multicentre trials in Hodgkin lymphoma. 2010, 37 (10):1824-33 Eur. J Nucl Med Mol Imaging
    Journal
    European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10541/115846
    DOI
    10.1007/s00259-010-1490-5
    PubMed ID
    20505930
    Type
    Article
    Language
    en
    ISSN
    1619-7089
    ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
    10.1007/s00259-010-1490-5
    Scopus Count
    Collections
    All Christie Publications
    Medical Oncology

    entitlement

    Related articles

    • International validation study for interim PET in ABVD-treated, advanced-stage hodgkin lymphoma: interpretation criteria and concordance rate among reviewers.
    • Authors: Biggi A, Gallamini A, Chauvie S, Hutchings M, Kostakoglu L, Gregianin M, Meignan M, Malkowski B, Hofman MS, Barrington SF
    • Issue date: 2013 May
    • Establishment of a UK-wide network to facilitate the acquisition of quality assured FDG-PET data for clinical trials in lymphoma.
    • Authors: Barrington SF, MacKewn JE, Schleyer P, Marsden PK, Mikhaeel NG, Qian W, Mouncey P, Patrick P, Popova B, Johnson P, Radford J, O'Doherty MJ
    • Issue date: 2011 Mar
    • PET-CT for staging and early response: results from the Response-Adapted Therapy in Advanced Hodgkin Lymphoma study.
    • Authors: Barrington SF, Kirkwood AA, Franceschetto A, Fulham MJ, Roberts TH, Almquist H, Brun E, Hjorthaug K, Viney ZN, Pike LC, Federico M, Luminari S, Radford J, Trotman J, Fosså A, Berkahn L, Molin D, D'Amore F, Sinclair DA, Smith P, O'Doherty MJ, Stevens L, Johnson PW
    • Issue date: 2016 Mar 24
    • PET-adapted treatment for newly diagnosed advanced Hodgkin lymphoma (AHL2011): a randomised, multicentre, non-inferiority, phase 3 study.
    • Authors: Casasnovas RO, Bouabdallah R, Brice P, Lazarovici J, Ghesquieres H, Stamatoullas A, Dupuis J, Gac AC, Gastinne T, Joly B, Bouabdallah K, Nicolas-Virelizier E, Feugier P, Morschhauser F, Delarue R, Farhat H, Quittet P, Berriolo-Riedinger A, Tempescul A, Edeline V, Maisonneuve H, Fornecker LM, Lamy T, Delmer A, Dartigues P, Martin L, André M, Mounier N, Traverse-Glehen A, Meignan M
    • Issue date: 2019 Feb
    • Positron Emission Tomography Score Has Greater Prognostic Significance Than Pretreatment Risk Stratification in Early-Stage Hodgkin Lymphoma in the UK RAPID Study.
    • Authors: Barrington SF, Phillips EH, Counsell N, Hancock B, Pettengell R, Johnson P, Townsend W, Culligan D, Popova B, Clifton-Hadley L, McMillan A, Hoskin P, O'Doherty MJ, Illidge T, Radford J
    • Issue date: 2019 Jul 10
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2025)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.