Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLord, Brian I
dc.date.accessioned2010-11-11T13:57:11Z
dc.date.available2010-11-11T13:57:11Z
dc.date.issued1988
dc.identifier.citationFeedback regulators in normal and tumour tissues. 1988, 10:231-42 J Cell Sci Supplen
dc.identifier.issn0269-3518
dc.identifier.pmid3077938
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10541/115419
dc.description.abstractRegulation of cell behaviour and population size is presumed to be not unlike classical regulation in non-biological systems, i.e. it is controlled by the cybernetic principle of negative feedback whereby the performance of progenitor cells depends inversely on a signal from their product, the size of which is proportional to the mass of the product. This signal may be inhibitory, acting directly on the progenitor cells. Alternatively, it may operate via an indirect and integrated inhibitor/stimulator feedback loop in which the one influences the production of the other. Illustrations taken from the various phases of haemopoietic development show the operation of these loops. Haemopoietic stem cells are under the direct influence of both inhibitor and stimulator but it is a feedback signal from the stem cell population that dictates the production of the one rather than the other. A second inhibitor acting at the stem cell level is a low molecular weight tetrapeptide which blocks the entry of cells into DNA synthesis, thus protecting them during a regimen of treatment with an S-phase cytotoxic drug. Proliferation of the maturing cells is also inhibited by feedback products of their fully mature descendants. Here, the effect is one of cell cycle modulation, whereas in the stem cell population the inhibitor and stimulator effect an on/off switch. Attempts to characterize the molecules involved have been limited. A series of tri- to pentapeptides has been described for haemopoietic or epithelial cell inhibitors. A common feature of several is a pGlu-Glu end though whether this has any significance is not known. In tumours it has been shown that some ascites are self-limiting and treatment of small tumours with cell-free fluid from a mature growth blocks their further growth. It appears that many tumour cells produce the feedback signals characteristic of their normal counterparts but are themselves less sensitive to it. The same is true of transforming growth factor-beta which is produced and detected by virtually all cell types. In this case, the factor, inhibiting in most cases, is produced in inactive form and achieves its target specificity by a localized capacity to activate it. Some tumours, while responding to exogenous active TGF-beta are incapable of activating the latent molecule. It is concluded that the differential sensitivity of normal and neoplastic tissues to physiological feedback regulators is a potentially exploitable property in cancer therapy.
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectCanceren
dc.subjectHaematopoiesisen
dc.subjectHaematopoietic Stem Cellsen
dc.subject.meshCell Division
dc.subject.meshFeedback
dc.subject.meshHematopoiesis
dc.subject.meshHematopoietic Stem Cells
dc.subject.meshHumans
dc.subject.meshNeoplasms
dc.subject.meshTransforming Growth Factors
dc.titleFeedback regulators in normal and tumour tissues.en
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.departmentPaterson Institute for Cancer Research, Christie Hospital, Manchester, UK.en
dc.identifier.journalJournal of Cell Science Supplementen
html.description.abstractRegulation of cell behaviour and population size is presumed to be not unlike classical regulation in non-biological systems, i.e. it is controlled by the cybernetic principle of negative feedback whereby the performance of progenitor cells depends inversely on a signal from their product, the size of which is proportional to the mass of the product. This signal may be inhibitory, acting directly on the progenitor cells. Alternatively, it may operate via an indirect and integrated inhibitor/stimulator feedback loop in which the one influences the production of the other. Illustrations taken from the various phases of haemopoietic development show the operation of these loops. Haemopoietic stem cells are under the direct influence of both inhibitor and stimulator but it is a feedback signal from the stem cell population that dictates the production of the one rather than the other. A second inhibitor acting at the stem cell level is a low molecular weight tetrapeptide which blocks the entry of cells into DNA synthesis, thus protecting them during a regimen of treatment with an S-phase cytotoxic drug. Proliferation of the maturing cells is also inhibited by feedback products of their fully mature descendants. Here, the effect is one of cell cycle modulation, whereas in the stem cell population the inhibitor and stimulator effect an on/off switch. Attempts to characterize the molecules involved have been limited. A series of tri- to pentapeptides has been described for haemopoietic or epithelial cell inhibitors. A common feature of several is a pGlu-Glu end though whether this has any significance is not known. In tumours it has been shown that some ascites are self-limiting and treatment of small tumours with cell-free fluid from a mature growth blocks their further growth. It appears that many tumour cells produce the feedback signals characteristic of their normal counterparts but are themselves less sensitive to it. The same is true of transforming growth factor-beta which is produced and detected by virtually all cell types. In this case, the factor, inhibiting in most cases, is produced in inactive form and achieves its target specificity by a localized capacity to activate it. Some tumours, while responding to exogenous active TGF-beta are incapable of activating the latent molecule. It is concluded that the differential sensitivity of normal and neoplastic tissues to physiological feedback regulators is a potentially exploitable property in cancer therapy.


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record