Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorArnold, F
dc.contributor.authorWest, David C
dc.contributor.authorSchofield, Philip F
dc.contributor.authorKumar, Shant
dc.date.accessioned2010-10-20T10:07:49Z
dc.date.available2010-10-20T10:07:49Z
dc.date.issued1987
dc.identifier.citationAngiogenic activity in human wound fluid. 1987, 5 (4):381-6 Int J Microcirc Clin Expen
dc.identifier.issn0167-6865
dc.identifier.pmid3557823
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10541/113536
dc.description.abstractWound drainage fluid from postoperative patients was examined for its ability to induce blood vessel growth using the chick chorio-allantoic membrane (CAM) assay. Sixteen samples from 12 patients were tested. The tests were performed on both whole unfractionated fluid and fluid after separation using diethyl aminoethyl cellulose (DEAE) ion exchange chromatography. All 16 samples were inactive before DEAE-chromatography but a fraction, eluting at between 300-400 mM salt, induced neovascularization in 15 out of 16 samples. These differences were statistically highly significant (p less than 0.001). Angiogenic factor (AF) was detected in fluids obtained from both clean and contaminated wounds, and in patients with benign and malignant disease. As mentioned earlier unfractionated wound fluids were nonangiogenic by themselves and their addition to the active fractions greatly reduced the angiogenic effect of the latter. Therefore we suggest that wound fluid contains both promoters and inhibitors of angiogenesis. The local balance between these may govern the rate of vascularisation during healing.
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectCanceren
dc.subject.meshAngiogenesis Inducing Agents
dc.subject.meshBiological Assay
dc.subject.meshGrowth Substances
dc.subject.meshHumans
dc.subject.meshNeoplasms
dc.subject.meshSurgical Procedures, Operative
dc.subject.meshWound Healing
dc.subject.meshWounds, Penetrating
dc.titleAngiogenic activity in human wound fluid.en
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.journalInternational Journal of Microcirculation, Clinical and Experimentalen
html.description.abstractWound drainage fluid from postoperative patients was examined for its ability to induce blood vessel growth using the chick chorio-allantoic membrane (CAM) assay. Sixteen samples from 12 patients were tested. The tests were performed on both whole unfractionated fluid and fluid after separation using diethyl aminoethyl cellulose (DEAE) ion exchange chromatography. All 16 samples were inactive before DEAE-chromatography but a fraction, eluting at between 300-400 mM salt, induced neovascularization in 15 out of 16 samples. These differences were statistically highly significant (p less than 0.001). Angiogenic factor (AF) was detected in fluids obtained from both clean and contaminated wounds, and in patients with benign and malignant disease. As mentioned earlier unfractionated wound fluids were nonangiogenic by themselves and their addition to the active fractions greatly reduced the angiogenic effect of the latter. Therefore we suggest that wound fluid contains both promoters and inhibitors of angiogenesis. The local balance between these may govern the rate of vascularisation during healing.


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record