Pazopanib in locally advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma: results of a randomized phase III trial.
Authors
Sternberg, Cora NDavis, Ian D
Mardiak, Jozef
Szczylik, Cezary
Lee, Eunsik
Wagstaff, John
Barrios, Carlos H
Salman, Pamela
Gladkov, Oleg A
Kavina, Alexander
Zarbá, Juan J
Chen, Mei
McCann, Lauren
Pandite, Lini
Roychowdhury, Debasish F
Hawkins, Robert E
Affiliation
FACP, Department of Medical Oncology, San Camillo Forlanini Hospital, Circonvallazione Gianicolense 87, Rome, Italy 00152. cstern@mclink.itIssue Date
2010-02-20
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
PURPOSE Pazopanib is an oral angiogenesis inhibitor targeting vascular endothelial growth factor receptor, platelet-derived growth factor receptor, and c-Kit. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study evaluated efficacy and safety of pazopanib monotherapy in treatment-naive and cytokine-pretreated patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS Adult patients with measurable, locally advanced, and/or metastatic RCC were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive oral pazopanib or placebo. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points included overall survival, tumor response rate (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors), and safety. Radiographic assessments of tumors were independently reviewed. Results Of 435 patients enrolled, 233 were treatment naive (54%) and 202 were cytokine pretreated (46%). PFS was significantly prolonged with pazopanib compared with placebo in the overall study population (median, PFS 9.2 v 4.2 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.46; 95% CI, 0.34 to 0.62; P < .0001), the treatment-naive subpopulation (median PFS 11.1 v 2.8 months; HR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.27 to 0.60; P < .0001), and the cytokine-pretreated subpopulation (median PFS, 7.4 v 4.2 months; HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.35 to 0.84; P < .001). The objective response rate was 30% with pazopanib compared with 3% with placebo (P < .001). The median duration of response was longer than 1 year. The most common adverse events were diarrhea, hypertension, hair color changes, nausea, anorexia, and vomiting. There was no evidence of clinically important differences in quality of life for pazopanib versus placebo. CONCLUSION Pazopanib demonstrated significant improvement in PFS and tumor response compared with placebo in treatment-naive and cytokine-pretreated patients with advanced and/or metastatic RCC.Citation
Pazopanib in locally advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma: results of a randomized phase III trial. 2010, 28 (6):1061-8 J. Clin. Oncol.Journal
Journal of Clinical OncologyDOI
10.1200/JCO.2009.23.9764PubMed ID
20100962Type
ArticleLanguage
enISSN
1527-7755ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1200/JCO.2009.23.9764
Scopus Count
Collections
Related articles
- Pazopanib in Locally Advanced or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: Results of a Randomized Phase III Trial.
- Authors: Sternberg CN, Davis ID, Mardiak J, Szczylik C, Lee E, Wagstaff J, Barrios CH, Salman P, Gladkov OA, Kavina A, Zarbá JJ, Chen M, McCann L, Pandite L, Roychowdhury DF, Hawkins RE
- Issue date: 2023 Apr 10
- An open-label extension study to evaluate safety and efficacy of pazopanib in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma.
- Authors: Sternberg CN, Davis ID, Deen KC, Sigal E, Hawkins RE
- Issue date: 2014
- Randomized Phase III Trial of Adjuvant Pazopanib Versus Placebo After Nephrectomy in Patients With Localized or Locally Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma.
- Authors: Motzer RJ, Haas NB, Donskov F, Gross-Goupil M, Varlamov S, Kopyltsov E, Lee JL, Melichar B, Rini BI, Choueiri TK, Zemanova M, Wood LA, Reaume MN, Stenzl A, Chowdhury S, Lim HY, McDermott R, Michael A, Bao W, Carrasco-Alfonso MJ, Aimone P, Voi M, Doehn C, Russo P, Sternberg CN, PROTECT investigators
- Issue date: 2017 Dec 10
- A randomised, double-blind phase III study of pazopanib in patients with advanced and/or metastatic renal cell carcinoma: final overall survival results and safety update.
- Authors: Sternberg CN, Hawkins RE, Wagstaff J, Salman P, Mardiak J, Barrios CH, Zarba JJ, Gladkov OA, Lee E, Szczylik C, McCann L, Rubin SD, Chen M, Davis ID
- Issue date: 2013 Apr
- Temsirolimus versus Pazopanib (TemPa) in Patients with Advanced Clear-cell Renal Cell Carcinoma and Poor-risk Features: A Randomized Phase II Trial.
- Authors: Tannir NM, Msaouel P, Ross JA, Devine CE, Chandramohan A, Gonzalez GMN, Wang X, Wang J, Corn PG, Lim ZD, Pruitt L, Karam JA, Wood CG, Zurita AJ
- Issue date: 2020 Oct
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Treatment for non small cell lung cancer, small cell lung cancer and pleural mesothelioma within the EORTC Lung Cancer Group: past, present and future.O'Brien, M; van Meerbeeck, J; Surmont, V; Faivre-Finn, Corinne (2012)
-
Ovarian cancer among 8,005 women from a breast cancer family history clinic: no increased risk of invasive ovarian cancer in families testing negative for BRCA1 and BRCA2.Ingham, S; Warwick, J; Buchan, I; Sahin, S; O'Hara, Catherine; Moran, Anthony; Howell, Anthony; Evans, D; Centre for Health Informatics, Institute of Population Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK. (2013-06)Mutations in BRCA1/2 genes confer ovarian, alongside breast, cancer risk. We examined the risk of developing ovarian cancer in BRCA1/2-positive families and if this risk is extended to BRCA negative families.
-
AZD8186 study 1: phase I study to assess the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD) and preliminary anti-tumour activity of AZD8186 in patients with advanced castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), squamous non-small cell lung cancer, triple negative breast cancer and with PTEN-deficient/mutated or PIK3CB mutated/amplified malignancies, as monotherapy and in combination with vistusertib (AZD2014) or abiraterone acetate.Lillian, S; De Bono, J; Higano, C; Shapiro, G; Brugger, W; Mitchell, P; Colebrook, S; Klinowska, T; Barry, S; Dean, Emma J; et al. (2016-12)