AuthorsClark, Catharine H
Hansen, Vibeke Nordmark
James, Hayley V
Webster, Gareth J
Guerrero Urbano, M Teresa
Bhide, Shree A
Bidmead, A Margaret
Nutting, Christoper M
AffiliationDepartment of Physics, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK. firstname.lastname@example.org
MetadataShow full item record
AbstractBACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: PARSPORT was a multi-centre randomised trial in the UK which compared Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) and conventional radiotherapy (CRT) for patients with head and neck cancer. The dosimetry audit goals were to verify the plan delivery in participating centres, ascertain what tolerances were suitable for head and neck IMRT trials and develop an IMRT credentialing program. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Centres enrolling patients underwent rigorous quality assurance before joining the trial. Following this each centre was visited for a dosimetry audit, which consisted of treatment planning system tests, fluence verification films, combined field films and dose point measurements. RESULTS: Mean dose point measurements were made at six centres. For the primary planning target volume (PTV) the differences with the planned values for the IMRT and CRT arms were -0.6% (1.8% to -2.4%) and 0.7% (2.0% to -0.9%), respectively. Ninety-four percent of the IMRT fluence films for individual fields passed gamma criterion of 3%/3mm and 75% of the films for combined fields passed gamma criterion 4%/3mm (no significant difference between dynamic delivery and step and shoot delivery). CONCLUSIONS: This audit suggests that a 3% tolerance could be applied for PTV point doses. For dose distributions tolerances of 3%/3mm on individual fields and 4%/3mm for combined fields are proposed for multi-centre head and neck IMRT trials.
CitationDosimetry audit for a multi-centre IMRT head and neck trial. 2009, 93 (1):102-8 Radiother Oncol
JournalRadiotherapy and Oncology
- Comparing 3DCRT and inversely optimized IMRT planning for head and neck cancer: equivalence between step-and-shoot and sliding window techniques.
- Authors: Longobardi B, De Martin E, Fiorino C, Dell'oca I, Broggi S, Cattaneo GM, Calandrino R
- Issue date: 2005 Nov
- Accuracy requirements for head and neck intensity-modulated radiation therapy based on observed dose response of the major salivary glands.
- Authors: Kapanen M, Collan J, Saarilahti K, Heikkonen J, Kairemo K, Tenhunen M
- Issue date: 2009 Oct
- DEMAT: A multi-institutional dosimetry audit of rotational and static intensity-modulated radiotherapy.
- Authors: Lafond C, Chiavassa S, Bertaut C, Boussion N, Chapel N, Chapron L, Coste F, Crespin S, Dy G, Faye PA, Leleu C, Bouvier J, Madec L, Mesgouez J, Palisson J, Vela A, Delpon G
- Issue date: 2016 May
- Multicriteria optimization enables less experienced planners to efficiently produce high quality treatment plans in head and neck cancer radiotherapy.
- Authors: Kierkels RG, Visser R, Bijl HP, Langendijk JA, van 't Veld AA, Steenbakkers RJ, Korevaar EW
- Issue date: 2015 Apr 12
- Stereotactic intensity modulated radiation therapy and inverse treatment planning for tumors of the head and neck region: clinical implementation of the step and shoot approach and first clinical results.
- Authors: Münter MW, Thilmann C, Hof H, Didinger B, Rhein B, Nill S, Schlegel W, Wannenmacher M, Debus J
- Issue date: 2003 Mar