Cisplatin plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine for biliary tract cancer.
dc.contributor.author | Valle, Juan W | |
dc.contributor.author | Wasan, H | |
dc.contributor.author | Palmer, D H | |
dc.contributor.author | Cunningham, D | |
dc.contributor.author | Anthoney, A | |
dc.contributor.author | Maraveyas, A | |
dc.contributor.author | Madhusudan, S | |
dc.contributor.author | Iveson, T | |
dc.contributor.author | Hughes, S | |
dc.contributor.author | Pereira, S P | |
dc.contributor.author | Roughton, M | |
dc.contributor.author | Bridgewater, J | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-08-04T14:04:44Z | |
dc.date.available | 2010-08-04T14:04:44Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2010-04-08 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Cisplatin plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine for biliary tract cancer. 2010, 362 (14):1273-81 N Engl J Med | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 1533-4406 | |
dc.identifier.pmid | 20375404 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1056/NEJMoa0908721 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10541/109073 | |
dc.description.abstract | BACKGROUND: There is no established standard chemotherapy for patients with locally advanced or metastatic biliary tract cancer. We initially conducted a randomized, phase 2 study involving 86 patients to compare cisplatin plus gemcitabine with gemcitabine alone. After we found an improvement in progression-free survival, the trial was extended to the phase 3 trial reported here. METHODS: We randomly assigned 410 patients with locally advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma, gallbladder cancer, or ampullary cancer to receive either cisplatin (25 mg per square meter of body-surface area) followed by gemcitabine (1000 mg per square meter on days 1 and 8, every 3 weeks for eight cycles) or gemcitabine alone (1000 mg per square meter on days 1, 8, and 15, every 4 weeks for six cycles) for up to 24 weeks. The primary end point was overall survival. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 8.2 months and 327 deaths, the median overall survival was 11.7 months among the 204 patients in the cisplatin-gemcitabine group and 8.1 months among the 206 patients in the gemcitabine group (hazard ratio, 0.64; 95% confidence interval, 0.52 to 0.80; P<0.001). The median progression-free survival was 8.0 months in the cisplatin-gemcitabine group and 5.0 months in the gemcitabine-only group (P<0.001). In addition, the rate of tumor control among patients in the cisplatin-gemcitabine group was significantly increased (81.4% vs. 71.8%, P=0.049). Adverse events were similar in the two groups, with the exception of more neutropenia in the cisplatin-gemcitabine group; the number of neutropenia-associated infections was similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: As compared with gemcitabine alone, cisplatin plus gemcitabine was associated with a significant survival advantage without the addition of substantial toxicity. Cisplatin plus gemcitabine is an appropriate option for the treatment of patients with advanced biliary cancer. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00262769.) | |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.subject | Biliary Tract Cancer | en |
dc.subject.mesh | Adult | |
dc.subject.mesh | Aged | |
dc.subject.mesh | Aged, 80 and over | |
dc.subject.mesh | Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic | |
dc.subject.mesh | Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols | |
dc.subject.mesh | Biliary Tract Neoplasms | |
dc.subject.mesh | Cisplatin | |
dc.subject.mesh | Deoxycytidine | |
dc.subject.mesh | Disease-Free Survival | |
dc.subject.mesh | Female | |
dc.subject.mesh | Follow-Up Studies | |
dc.subject.mesh | Humans | |
dc.subject.mesh | Kaplan-Meiers Estimate | |
dc.subject.mesh | Male | |
dc.subject.mesh | Middle Aged | |
dc.subject.mesh | Neutropenia | |
dc.subject.mesh | Patient Compliance | |
dc.subject.mesh | Proportional Hazards Models | |
dc.title | Cisplatin plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine for biliary tract cancer. | en |
dc.type | Article | en |
dc.contributor.department | Christie Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom. | en |
dc.identifier.journal | The New England Journal of Medicine | en |
html.description.abstract | BACKGROUND: There is no established standard chemotherapy for patients with locally advanced or metastatic biliary tract cancer. We initially conducted a randomized, phase 2 study involving 86 patients to compare cisplatin plus gemcitabine with gemcitabine alone. After we found an improvement in progression-free survival, the trial was extended to the phase 3 trial reported here. METHODS: We randomly assigned 410 patients with locally advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma, gallbladder cancer, or ampullary cancer to receive either cisplatin (25 mg per square meter of body-surface area) followed by gemcitabine (1000 mg per square meter on days 1 and 8, every 3 weeks for eight cycles) or gemcitabine alone (1000 mg per square meter on days 1, 8, and 15, every 4 weeks for six cycles) for up to 24 weeks. The primary end point was overall survival. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 8.2 months and 327 deaths, the median overall survival was 11.7 months among the 204 patients in the cisplatin-gemcitabine group and 8.1 months among the 206 patients in the gemcitabine group (hazard ratio, 0.64; 95% confidence interval, 0.52 to 0.80; P<0.001). The median progression-free survival was 8.0 months in the cisplatin-gemcitabine group and 5.0 months in the gemcitabine-only group (P<0.001). In addition, the rate of tumor control among patients in the cisplatin-gemcitabine group was significantly increased (81.4% vs. 71.8%, P=0.049). Adverse events were similar in the two groups, with the exception of more neutropenia in the cisplatin-gemcitabine group; the number of neutropenia-associated infections was similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: As compared with gemcitabine alone, cisplatin plus gemcitabine was associated with a significant survival advantage without the addition of substantial toxicity. Cisplatin plus gemcitabine is an appropriate option for the treatment of patients with advanced biliary cancer. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00262769.) |