Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorValle, Juan W
dc.contributor.authorWasan, H
dc.contributor.authorPalmer, D H
dc.contributor.authorCunningham, D
dc.contributor.authorAnthoney, A
dc.contributor.authorMaraveyas, A
dc.contributor.authorMadhusudan, S
dc.contributor.authorIveson, T
dc.contributor.authorHughes, S
dc.contributor.authorPereira, S P
dc.contributor.authorRoughton, M
dc.contributor.authorBridgewater, J
dc.date.accessioned2010-08-04T14:04:44Z
dc.date.available2010-08-04T14:04:44Z
dc.date.issued2010-04-08
dc.identifier.citationCisplatin plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine for biliary tract cancer. 2010, 362 (14):1273-81 N Engl J Meden
dc.identifier.issn1533-4406
dc.identifier.pmid20375404
dc.identifier.doi10.1056/NEJMoa0908721
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10541/109073
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: There is no established standard chemotherapy for patients with locally advanced or metastatic biliary tract cancer. We initially conducted a randomized, phase 2 study involving 86 patients to compare cisplatin plus gemcitabine with gemcitabine alone. After we found an improvement in progression-free survival, the trial was extended to the phase 3 trial reported here. METHODS: We randomly assigned 410 patients with locally advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma, gallbladder cancer, or ampullary cancer to receive either cisplatin (25 mg per square meter of body-surface area) followed by gemcitabine (1000 mg per square meter on days 1 and 8, every 3 weeks for eight cycles) or gemcitabine alone (1000 mg per square meter on days 1, 8, and 15, every 4 weeks for six cycles) for up to 24 weeks. The primary end point was overall survival. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 8.2 months and 327 deaths, the median overall survival was 11.7 months among the 204 patients in the cisplatin-gemcitabine group and 8.1 months among the 206 patients in the gemcitabine group (hazard ratio, 0.64; 95% confidence interval, 0.52 to 0.80; P<0.001). The median progression-free survival was 8.0 months in the cisplatin-gemcitabine group and 5.0 months in the gemcitabine-only group (P<0.001). In addition, the rate of tumor control among patients in the cisplatin-gemcitabine group was significantly increased (81.4% vs. 71.8%, P=0.049). Adverse events were similar in the two groups, with the exception of more neutropenia in the cisplatin-gemcitabine group; the number of neutropenia-associated infections was similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: As compared with gemcitabine alone, cisplatin plus gemcitabine was associated with a significant survival advantage without the addition of substantial toxicity. Cisplatin plus gemcitabine is an appropriate option for the treatment of patients with advanced biliary cancer. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00262769.)
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectBiliary Tract Canceren
dc.subject.meshAdult
dc.subject.meshAged
dc.subject.meshAged, 80 and over
dc.subject.meshAntimetabolites, Antineoplastic
dc.subject.meshAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
dc.subject.meshBiliary Tract Neoplasms
dc.subject.meshCisplatin
dc.subject.meshDeoxycytidine
dc.subject.meshDisease-Free Survival
dc.subject.meshFemale
dc.subject.meshFollow-Up Studies
dc.subject.meshHumans
dc.subject.meshKaplan-Meiers Estimate
dc.subject.meshMale
dc.subject.meshMiddle Aged
dc.subject.meshNeutropenia
dc.subject.meshPatient Compliance
dc.subject.meshProportional Hazards Models
dc.titleCisplatin plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine for biliary tract cancer.en
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.departmentChristie Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom.en
dc.identifier.journalThe New England Journal of Medicineen
html.description.abstractBACKGROUND: There is no established standard chemotherapy for patients with locally advanced or metastatic biliary tract cancer. We initially conducted a randomized, phase 2 study involving 86 patients to compare cisplatin plus gemcitabine with gemcitabine alone. After we found an improvement in progression-free survival, the trial was extended to the phase 3 trial reported here. METHODS: We randomly assigned 410 patients with locally advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma, gallbladder cancer, or ampullary cancer to receive either cisplatin (25 mg per square meter of body-surface area) followed by gemcitabine (1000 mg per square meter on days 1 and 8, every 3 weeks for eight cycles) or gemcitabine alone (1000 mg per square meter on days 1, 8, and 15, every 4 weeks for six cycles) for up to 24 weeks. The primary end point was overall survival. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 8.2 months and 327 deaths, the median overall survival was 11.7 months among the 204 patients in the cisplatin-gemcitabine group and 8.1 months among the 206 patients in the gemcitabine group (hazard ratio, 0.64; 95% confidence interval, 0.52 to 0.80; P<0.001). The median progression-free survival was 8.0 months in the cisplatin-gemcitabine group and 5.0 months in the gemcitabine-only group (P<0.001). In addition, the rate of tumor control among patients in the cisplatin-gemcitabine group was significantly increased (81.4% vs. 71.8%, P=0.049). Adverse events were similar in the two groups, with the exception of more neutropenia in the cisplatin-gemcitabine group; the number of neutropenia-associated infections was similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: As compared with gemcitabine alone, cisplatin plus gemcitabine was associated with a significant survival advantage without the addition of substantial toxicity. Cisplatin plus gemcitabine is an appropriate option for the treatment of patients with advanced biliary cancer. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00262769.)


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record