Can long-term survival be improved in patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) and good performance status? Medical Research Council Lung Cancer Working Party.
dc.contributor.author | Bleehen, N M | |
dc.contributor.author | Girling, D J | |
dc.contributor.author | Gregor, A | |
dc.contributor.author | Leonard, R C | |
dc.contributor.author | Machin, D | |
dc.contributor.author | McKenzie, C G | |
dc.contributor.author | Morgan, D A | |
dc.contributor.author | Smyth, J F | |
dc.contributor.author | Spittle, M F | |
dc.contributor.author | Stephens, R J | |
dc.contributor.author | Thatcher, Nick | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-07-30T13:21:14Z | |
dc.date.available | 2010-07-30T13:21:14Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1994-07 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Can long-term survival be improved in patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) and good performance status? Medical Research Council Lung Cancer Working Party. 1994, 70 (1):142-4 Br. J. Cancer | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 0007-0920 | |
dc.identifier.pmid | 8018526 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10541/108699 | |
dc.description.abstract | Results from a long-term follow-up suggest that in patients with limited small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) and normal performance status intensive alternating chemotherapy and radiotherapy improve long-term survival rates. In a non-randomised study, 22 patients with SCLC of limited extent and good performance status were prescribed six cycles of etoposide, doxorubicin, cisplatin and cyclophosphamide at 4 week intervals with doses of thoracic radiotherapy following the second, third and fourth cycles. Although only six patients received all their prescribed treatment, nine (41%) were alive at 1 year, seven (32%) at 2 years, six (27%) at 3 years, and four are still alive at, respectively, 42, 47, 50, and 61 months, all four being in the subgroup of eight patients with WHO performance status grade 0 at the start of treatment. In a comparison with similar patients receiving conventionally scheduled chemotherapy and radiotherapy in a concurrent trial, no difference in survival was seen in the patients with performance status grade 1 or 2, but a large difference in favour of the alternating schedule in those with grade 0 status was seen. We encourage other investigators to report the results achieved with intensive treatment in patients with WHO grade 0 performance status at the start of treatment. | |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.subject | Lung Cancer | en |
dc.subject.mesh | Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols | |
dc.subject.mesh | Carcinoma, Small Cell | |
dc.subject.mesh | Cisplatin | |
dc.subject.mesh | Combined Modality Therapy | |
dc.subject.mesh | Cyclophosphamide | |
dc.subject.mesh | Doxorubicin | |
dc.subject.mesh | Drug Administration Schedule | |
dc.subject.mesh | Etoposide | |
dc.subject.mesh | Humans | |
dc.subject.mesh | Lung Neoplasms | |
dc.subject.mesh | Proportional Hazards Models | |
dc.subject.mesh | Radiotherapy Dosage | |
dc.subject.mesh | Radiotherapy, High-Energy | |
dc.subject.mesh | Survival Analysis | |
dc.subject.mesh | Survival Rate | |
dc.title | Can long-term survival be improved in patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) and good performance status? Medical Research Council Lung Cancer Working Party. | en |
dc.type | Article | en |
dc.contributor.department | MRC Clinical Oncology and Radiotherapeutics Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK. | en |
dc.identifier.journal | British Journal of Cancer | en |
html.description.abstract | Results from a long-term follow-up suggest that in patients with limited small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) and normal performance status intensive alternating chemotherapy and radiotherapy improve long-term survival rates. In a non-randomised study, 22 patients with SCLC of limited extent and good performance status were prescribed six cycles of etoposide, doxorubicin, cisplatin and cyclophosphamide at 4 week intervals with doses of thoracic radiotherapy following the second, third and fourth cycles. Although only six patients received all their prescribed treatment, nine (41%) were alive at 1 year, seven (32%) at 2 years, six (27%) at 3 years, and four are still alive at, respectively, 42, 47, 50, and 61 months, all four being in the subgroup of eight patients with WHO performance status grade 0 at the start of treatment. In a comparison with similar patients receiving conventionally scheduled chemotherapy and radiotherapy in a concurrent trial, no difference in survival was seen in the patients with performance status grade 1 or 2, but a large difference in favour of the alternating schedule in those with grade 0 status was seen. We encourage other investigators to report the results achieved with intensive treatment in patients with WHO grade 0 performance status at the start of treatment. |