Therapy for poor-risk patients with small-cell lung cancer using bolus ifosfamide and oral etoposide.
dc.contributor.author | Anderson, Heather | |
dc.contributor.author | Lind, Michael J | |
dc.contributor.author | Thatcher, Nick | |
dc.contributor.author | Swindell, Ric | |
dc.contributor.author | Woodcock, A A | |
dc.contributor.author | Carroll, K B | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-07-14T15:54:14Z | |
dc.date.available | 2010-07-14T15:54:14Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1990 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Therapy for poor-risk patients with small-cell lung cancer using bolus ifosfamide and oral etoposide. 1990, 26 (1):71-4 Cancer Chemother Pharmacol | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 0344-5704 | |
dc.identifier.pmid | 2157555 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10541/107632 | |
dc.description.abstract | A total of 47 poor-risk small-cell lung cancer patients (elderly, poor performance status, recent myocardial infarction, or extensive-stage disease with biochemical abnormalities) were treated with a regimen of bolus ifosfamide at 1.5 g/m2 with equidose mesna as a 30-min infusion, followed by 100 mg oral etoposide daily for 8 days. Therapy was repeated every 3 weeks. The overall response rate was 60% (75% for limited-stage and 48% for extensive-stage disease), and the overall median survival was 7 months. Patients' performance status significantly improved with therapy (P less than 0.0001). Despite the poor-risk factors, the Manchester prognostic score was applied and verified. The median survival was 8 months for patients with a good prognosis, 6 months for those with an intermediate prognosis and 2.5 months for poor-prognosis patients (P = 0.0002). Therapy was well tolerated. The median WHO grade of haematological toxicity was 2 (range, 0-4). Only 10/226 (4%) courses were delayed due to leukopenia. Blood transfusions followed 18/226 (8%) courses. Intravenous antibiotics were given following 15/226 (7%) courses. No patient required platelet support. Poor-risk patients who have a good or intermediate Manchester prognostic score may benefit from this low-toxicity regimen. | |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.subject | Lung Cancer | en |
dc.subject | Cancer Staging | en |
dc.subject.mesh | Aged | |
dc.subject.mesh | Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols | |
dc.subject.mesh | Carcinoma, Small Cell | |
dc.subject.mesh | Etoposide | |
dc.subject.mesh | Female | |
dc.subject.mesh | Humans | |
dc.subject.mesh | Ifosfamide | |
dc.subject.mesh | Lung Neoplasms | |
dc.subject.mesh | Male | |
dc.subject.mesh | Middle Aged | |
dc.subject.mesh | Neoplasm Staging | |
dc.subject.mesh | Prognosis | |
dc.subject.mesh | Risk Factors | |
dc.title | Therapy for poor-risk patients with small-cell lung cancer using bolus ifosfamide and oral etoposide. | en |
dc.type | Article | en |
dc.contributor.department | CRC Department Medical Oncology, Christie Hospital, Manchester. | en |
dc.identifier.journal | Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology | en |
html.description.abstract | A total of 47 poor-risk small-cell lung cancer patients (elderly, poor performance status, recent myocardial infarction, or extensive-stage disease with biochemical abnormalities) were treated with a regimen of bolus ifosfamide at 1.5 g/m2 with equidose mesna as a 30-min infusion, followed by 100 mg oral etoposide daily for 8 days. Therapy was repeated every 3 weeks. The overall response rate was 60% (75% for limited-stage and 48% for extensive-stage disease), and the overall median survival was 7 months. Patients' performance status significantly improved with therapy (P less than 0.0001). Despite the poor-risk factors, the Manchester prognostic score was applied and verified. The median survival was 8 months for patients with a good prognosis, 6 months for those with an intermediate prognosis and 2.5 months for poor-prognosis patients (P = 0.0002). Therapy was well tolerated. The median WHO grade of haematological toxicity was 2 (range, 0-4). Only 10/226 (4%) courses were delayed due to leukopenia. Blood transfusions followed 18/226 (8%) courses. Intravenous antibiotics were given following 15/226 (7%) courses. No patient required platelet support. Poor-risk patients who have a good or intermediate Manchester prognostic score may benefit from this low-toxicity regimen. |