Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAnderson, Heather
dc.contributor.authorLind, Michael J
dc.contributor.authorThatcher, Nick
dc.contributor.authorSwindell, Ric
dc.contributor.authorWoodcock, A A
dc.contributor.authorCarroll, K B
dc.date.accessioned2010-07-14T15:54:14Z
dc.date.available2010-07-14T15:54:14Z
dc.date.issued1990
dc.identifier.citationTherapy for poor-risk patients with small-cell lung cancer using bolus ifosfamide and oral etoposide. 1990, 26 (1):71-4 Cancer Chemother Pharmacolen
dc.identifier.issn0344-5704
dc.identifier.pmid2157555
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10541/107632
dc.description.abstractA total of 47 poor-risk small-cell lung cancer patients (elderly, poor performance status, recent myocardial infarction, or extensive-stage disease with biochemical abnormalities) were treated with a regimen of bolus ifosfamide at 1.5 g/m2 with equidose mesna as a 30-min infusion, followed by 100 mg oral etoposide daily for 8 days. Therapy was repeated every 3 weeks. The overall response rate was 60% (75% for limited-stage and 48% for extensive-stage disease), and the overall median survival was 7 months. Patients' performance status significantly improved with therapy (P less than 0.0001). Despite the poor-risk factors, the Manchester prognostic score was applied and verified. The median survival was 8 months for patients with a good prognosis, 6 months for those with an intermediate prognosis and 2.5 months for poor-prognosis patients (P = 0.0002). Therapy was well tolerated. The median WHO grade of haematological toxicity was 2 (range, 0-4). Only 10/226 (4%) courses were delayed due to leukopenia. Blood transfusions followed 18/226 (8%) courses. Intravenous antibiotics were given following 15/226 (7%) courses. No patient required platelet support. Poor-risk patients who have a good or intermediate Manchester prognostic score may benefit from this low-toxicity regimen.
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectLung Canceren
dc.subjectCancer Stagingen
dc.subject.meshAged
dc.subject.meshAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
dc.subject.meshCarcinoma, Small Cell
dc.subject.meshEtoposide
dc.subject.meshFemale
dc.subject.meshHumans
dc.subject.meshIfosfamide
dc.subject.meshLung Neoplasms
dc.subject.meshMale
dc.subject.meshMiddle Aged
dc.subject.meshNeoplasm Staging
dc.subject.meshPrognosis
dc.subject.meshRisk Factors
dc.titleTherapy for poor-risk patients with small-cell lung cancer using bolus ifosfamide and oral etoposide.en
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.departmentCRC Department Medical Oncology, Christie Hospital, Manchester.en
dc.identifier.journalCancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacologyen
html.description.abstractA total of 47 poor-risk small-cell lung cancer patients (elderly, poor performance status, recent myocardial infarction, or extensive-stage disease with biochemical abnormalities) were treated with a regimen of bolus ifosfamide at 1.5 g/m2 with equidose mesna as a 30-min infusion, followed by 100 mg oral etoposide daily for 8 days. Therapy was repeated every 3 weeks. The overall response rate was 60% (75% for limited-stage and 48% for extensive-stage disease), and the overall median survival was 7 months. Patients' performance status significantly improved with therapy (P less than 0.0001). Despite the poor-risk factors, the Manchester prognostic score was applied and verified. The median survival was 8 months for patients with a good prognosis, 6 months for those with an intermediate prognosis and 2.5 months for poor-prognosis patients (P = 0.0002). Therapy was well tolerated. The median WHO grade of haematological toxicity was 2 (range, 0-4). Only 10/226 (4%) courses were delayed due to leukopenia. Blood transfusions followed 18/226 (8%) courses. Intravenous antibiotics were given following 15/226 (7%) courses. No patient required platelet support. Poor-risk patients who have a good or intermediate Manchester prognostic score may benefit from this low-toxicity regimen.


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record