The strength of female sex as a prognostic factor in small-cell lung cancer: a pooled analysis of chemotherapy trials from the Manchester Lung Group and Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit.
Stephens, R J
White, Shane C
Lorigan, Paul C
Blackhall, Fiona H
Shepherd, F A
AffiliationDepartment of Medical Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital/University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario. firstname.lastname@example.org
MetadataShow full item record
AbstractBACKGROUND: Previous studies reported that women survive longer than men, but experience greater toxicity, when treated for small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). METHODS: Individual patient data from six randomized phase II/III chemotherapy trials, from the Manchester Lung Group and UK Medical Research Council, were pooled for analysis. End points included overall survival, response rate, toxicity, dose intensity (DI) and transfusion rates. RESULTS: Of 1707 patients analyzed, 44% were women. At baseline, women had poorer performance status (PS) (57% versus 67% Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group PS 0-1/Karnofsky PS 80-100, P = 0.0004) and more were of normal weight or underweight (57% versus 48%, P = 0.003), but fewer were anemic (25% versus 62%, P < 0.0001). Response rates between women and men were similar (77% versus 76%, P = 0.64). In univariate [hazard ratio (HR) 0.85, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.76-0.96, P = 0.006] and multivariate (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.79-0.99, P = 0.04) analyses, female sex predicted for longer survival. Women experienced more grade 3/4 emesis (18% versus 9%, P < 0.0001) and grade 3/4 mucositis (13% versus 8%, P = 0.005) than men. There were no differences in DI, infections, transfusions or treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSION: Data from >1700 patients in randomized SCLC chemotherapy trials confirm that women survive modestly longer than men but may experience greater toxicity.
CitationThe strength of female sex as a prognostic factor in small-cell lung cancer: a pooled analysis of chemotherapy trials from the Manchester Lung Group and Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit. 2010, 21 (2):232-7 Ann Oncol
JournalAnnals of Oncology
- The influence of sex on efficacy, adverse events, quality of life, and delivery of treatment in National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group non-small cell lung cancer chemotherapy trials.
- Authors: Wheatley-Price P, Le Maître A, Ding K, Leighl N, Hirsh V, Seymour L, Bezjak A, Shepherd FA, NCIC Clinical Trials Group.
- Issue date: 2010 May
- Baseline quality of life and performance status as prognostic factors in patients with extensive-stage disease small cell lung cancer treated with pemetrexed plus carboplatin vs. etoposide plus carboplatin.
- Authors: Reck M, Thatcher N, Smit EF, Lorigan P, Szutowicz-Zielinska E, Liepa AM, Winfree KB, Peterson P, Guba SC, Socinski MA
- Issue date: 2012 Dec
- Prognostic factors differ by tumor stage for small cell lung cancer: a pooled analysis of North Central Cancer Treatment Group trials.
- Authors: Foster NR, Mandrekar SJ, Schild SE, Nelson GD, Rowland KM Jr, Deming RL, Kozelsky TF, Marks RS, Jett JR, Adjei AA
- Issue date: 2009 Jun 15
- Common arm comparative outcomes analysis of phase 3 trials of cisplatin + irinotecan versus cisplatin + etoposide in extensive stage small cell lung cancer: final patient-level results from Japan Clinical Oncology Group 9511 and Southwest Oncology Group 0124.
- Authors: Lara PN Jr, Chansky K, Shibata T, Fukuda H, Tamura T, Crowley J, Redman MW, Natale R, Saijo N, Gandara DR
- Issue date: 2010 Dec 15
- Randomized phase II study of carboplatin plus irinotecan versus carboplatin plus amrubicin in patients with chemo-naïve extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: North Japan Lung Cancer Study Group (NJLCG) 0901.
- Authors: Morikawa N, Inoue A, Sugawara S, Maemondo M, Harada T, Harada M, Fujita Y, Katoh T, Yokouchi H, Watanabe H, Usui K, Suzuki T, Sakakibara-Konishi J, Nagai H, Kanbe M, Nukiwa T
- Issue date: 2017 Sep