Loading...
Primary results from IMpassion131, a double-blind placebo-controlled randomised phase III trial of first- line paclitaxel (PAC) +/- atezolizumab (atezo) for unresectable locally advanced/metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC)
Miles, D. W. ; Gligorov, J. ; Andre, F. ; Cameron, D. ; Schneeweiss, A. ; Barrios, C. H. ; Xu, B. ; Wardley, Andrew M ; Kaen, D. ; Andrade, L. ... show 7 more
Miles, D. W.
Gligorov, J.
Andre, F.
Cameron, D.
Schneeweiss, A.
Barrios, C. H.
Xu, B.
Wardley, Andrew M
Kaen, D.
Andrade, L.
Citations
Altmetric:
Abstract
Background: In the phase 3 IMpassion130 trial, combining atezo with first-line nabpaclitaxel
for mTNBC showed significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS)
and clinically meaningful overall survival (OS) benefit in patients with PD-L1+ mTNBC
[Schmid NEJM 2018]. IMpassion131 (NCT03125902) evaluated atezo + PAC as firstline
treatment for mTNBC.
Methods: Eligible patients (no prior systemic therapy or ≥12 months since [neo]
adjuvant chemotherapy) were randomised 2:1 to atezo 840 mg or placebo (d 1 & 15
q28d), both with PAC 90 mg/m2 (d 1, 8 & 15 q28d) until disease progression or
unacceptable toxicity. Stratification factors were tumour PD-L1 status (immune cell
[IC] expression <1% vs 1% by VENTANA SP142 assay), prior taxane, liver metastases
and geographic region. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed PFS, tested
hierarchically first in the PD-L1+ (IC 1%) population, then in the intent-to-treat (ITT)
population. OS and overall response rate (ORR) were secondary endpoints.
Results: Of 651 randomised patients, 45% had PD-L1+ mTNBC, 48% were taxane
pretreated, 31% had de novo mTNBC and 27% liver metastases. Adding atezo to PAC
did not improve PFS or OS in either the PD-L1+ or ITT populations (Table). PFS results
in subgroups were consistent with primary results. PAC exposure was not compromised
by the addition of atezo. Grade 5 (2% placebo vs 2% atezo) and grade 3/4 AEs
(43% vs 49%) were balanced between arms and the safety profile was consistent with
known risks of each study drug.
Conclusions: Atezo + PAC did not improve PFS or OS vs placebo + PAC. No new safety
signals were seen. Potential reasons for the contrast with the benefit seen in
IMpassion130 (atezo + nab-paclitaxel) need further exploration.
Description
Date
2020
Publisher
Collections
Files
Loading...
From UNPAYWALL
Adobe PDF, 116.51 KB
Keywords
Type
Article
Citation
Miles DW, Gligorov J, André F, Cameron D, Schneeweiss A, Barrios CH, et al. LBA15 Primary results from IMpassion131, a double-blind placebo-controlled randomised phase III trial of first-line paclitaxel (PAC) ± atezolizumab (atezo) for unresectable locally advanced/metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC). Annals of Oncology. 2020;31:S1147-S8.